Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional study finds high myopia thins the choroid while prediabetes thickens it in Korean adults, indicating distinct additive metabolic and structural effects.
Purpose To investigate the independent and interactive associations of high myopia (HM) and glucose metabolism status with subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) in a nationwide, population-based study.Methods This cross-sectional study analyzed data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2019–2021. Participants were classified into a HM group (axial length [AL] >26.0 mm) and a control group (AL < 24.5 mm). Glucose metabolism status was categorized as normal, prediabetes, or diabetes mellitus (DM). Survey-weighted linear regression analyses were performed to identify independent determinants of SFCT. Interaction terms between HM and glucose metabolism status were additionally included to assess potential synergistic effects.Results A total of 9,132 participants were included, of whom 1,118 (12.2%) were classified as HM. The distribution of glucose metabolism status differed significantly across groups (p < 0.001), with a higher prevalence of prediabetes and DM in the control group (46.4% vs. 34.3% and 15.4% vs. 10.1%, respectively). HM was associated with a substantial decrease in SFCT (β = −107.25, p < 0.001), whereas prediabetes was associated with an increase in SFCT (β = 5.58, p = 0.015) after full adjustment for potential confounders. DM showed no significant association with SFCT (p = 0.705). No significant interaction was observed between HM and glucose metabolism status, indicating additive rather than synergistic effects. These findings were consistent across sensitivity analyses.Conclusion In this nationwide, population-based study, prediabetes was associated with increased SFCT independent of HM. The absence of an association between DM and SFCT suggests that DM may exert opposing, stage-dependent effects on SFCT according to disease severity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cho et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: