Machine learning study demonstrates accurate carbonation depth prediction in concrete bridges, indicating improved reliability mapping for structural service life.
Predicting concrete carbonation depth is essential for durability design and life-cycle management of concrete bridges. This study combines a physics-informed neural network with a calibrated ensemble of classical learners to estimate the carbonation coefficient and map service life reliability. The learning target is derived from the square-root-of-time law for carbonation front propagation. The PINN is trained on the same descriptors as the ensemble and includes a residual penalty from a reaction–diffusion surrogate. Reliability is obtained by propagating the predictive distribution to the time of steel depassivation. For 8204 tests, the calibrated ensemble gives cross-validated errors of 4.44 mm in MAE and 6.69 mm in RMSE (R2 = 0.77) using 60 physically motivated and spline-expanded features with reference encoding for inter-laboratory domain shift. The PINN gives a validation RMSE of 2.79 mm and R2 = 0.86 on the held-out split. The resulting reliability maps separate cover depth and exposure scenarios while retaining uncertainty consistent with residual dispersion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: