Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental study demonstrates efficient arsenite detoxification and plant protection in Vigna radiata by Bacillus subtilis ULB16, indicating strong potential for biological bioremediation.
Arsenic contamination, particularly in the form of the highly toxic and mobile Arsenite (As (III)), poses a serious threat to environmental sustainability, agricultural productivity, and food safety. Biological detoxification using naturally resilient microorganisms offers a sustainable alternative to conventional remediation approaches. In this study, a marine macroalgal endophyte, Bacillus subtilis ULB16, isolated from Ulva lactuca , was evaluated for its As (III) tolerance, detoxification potential, and genetic basis of arsenic resistance. The strain exhibited a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 12mg/mL for As (III) and maintained growth over a broad pH range (4-11) and temperatures between 28 and 45°C. As (III) exposure induced changes in colony morphology, cell surface ultrastructure, and cell envelope-associated functional groups, indicating adaptive responses to arsenic stress. ICP-MS analysis demonstrated that approximately 80% of the arsenic was removed from the culture medium within 48 h, with negligible intracellular arsenic accumulation, while a qualitative silver nitrate assay confirmed the oxidation of As (III) to As (V) In a hydroponic system, bacterial treatment alleviated As (III)-induced phytotoxicity in Vigna radiata , with pre-treatment of the As (III)-containing medium resulting in greater plant growth recovery and minimal arsenic accumulation in plant tissues compared with direct inoculation. Whole-genome sequencing identified multiple arsenic resistance-associated genes, including arsR, arsB, arsC, czrA , and cotA , providing a molecular basis for the observed arsenic tolerance. Collectively, the physiological, analytical, and genomic findings demonstrate that B. subtilis ULB16 possesses multiple arsenic resistance traits and highlight its potential as a promising candidate for biological arsenic bioremediation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anand et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: