Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: To investigate the influence of preoperative physical training combining aerobic and breathing exercises on surgical lung cancer patients with impaired lung function. Methods: A total of 68 patients with predicted postoperative FEV1% <60% were equally and randomly assigned into one-week physical training combining aerobic and breathing exercises (intervened group: IG) or routine preoperative preparation (control group: CG). Then, 6-min walking distance (6-MWD), in-hospital length of stay (LOS), and other clinical variables were included and recorded. Results: An increase of 22.6±27.0 m of 6-MWD was observed in IG, compared to 2.7±27.6 m in CG (between-group difference: 19.9 m, 95% CI: 6.7 to 33.2, P=0.004), but no difference was found in lung function. The emotional function of EORTC-QLQ-30 was significantly improved in IG after the training regimen, compared to CG. Meanwhile, the intervened patients (IG) had significantly lower postoperative pulmonary complication (PPC) rate (11.8%, 4/34 vs. 35.3%, 12/34, P=0.022), shorter postoperative LOS [median: 5.0 interquartile (4.0–7.0) vs. 8.0 (7.0–10.0) days, P<0.001] and lower costs, including total cost [48,588.7 (44,999.1–52,693.3) vs. 52,445.3 (49,002.9–61,994.0) ¥, P=0.016], material cost [23,350.8 (18,300.6–26,421.9) vs. 25,730.0 (21,328.7–29,250.2) ¥, P=0.048] and drug cost [7,230.0 (6,661.9–8,347.4) vs. 11,388.6 (7,963.0–16,314.3) ¥, P<0.001]. Conclusions: The preoperative physical training combining aerobic and breathing exercises can improve exercise capacity, decrease the occurrence of PPCs, and shorten LOS with lower in-hospital cost; it thus shows potential to be an effective preparation strategy for surgical lung cancer patients with limited lung function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lai et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: