Key result
Lyophilized bovine pericardium showed no significant differences in calcification or inflammatory reactions compared to nonlyophilized samples when implanted subcutaneously in rats (P > 0.05).
Why the study?
Does lyophilization of glutaraldehyde-treated bovine pericardium affect its biocompatibility when implanted subcutaneously in rats?
Does lyophilization of glutaraldehyde-treated bovine pericardium affect its biocompatibility when implanted subcutaneously in rats?
p-value: p=> 0.05
Lyophilization of glutaraldehyde-treated bovine pericardium does not increase adverse tissue reactions when implanted subcutaneously in rats, suggesting preserved biocompatibility.
Supports further preclinical testing of lyophilized pericardium; leaves open translation to clinical bioprostheses.
This article aims at investigating in vivo evaluation of lyophilization procedure on the biocompatibility of bovine pericardium treated with glutaraldehyde (GA). The bovine pericardium was fixed with 0.5% glutaraldehyde during 10 days and preserved in 4% formaldehyde (FA). Two groups of samples were prepared from treated membranes: Group 1, nonlyophilized samples and Group 2, lyophilized samples. Male Sprague-Dawley rats (4 weeks after birth) were anesthetized (pentobarbital sodium 25 mg/kg of body weight) and in each one were implanted subcutaneously in the dorsal region a sample from Group 1 and another from Group 2. These samples were explanted after 30 days for histological analysis. No intercurrences took place after the surgery. No differences (P > 0.05) in the calcification, granulomatous reaction, mononuclear infiltration, and granulation tissue development was observed between both groups. The implanted lyophilized samples presented a trend for a reduced inflammatory reaction. Lyophilization of the bovine pericardium does not seem to increase the above listed tissue reaction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maizato et al. (2008) studied Biocompatibility of bovine pericardium. Lyophilized bovine pericardium treated with glutaraldehyde vs. Nonlyophilized bovine pericardium treated with glutaraldehyde was evaluated on Calcification, granulomatous reaction, mononuclear infiltration, and granulation tissue development (p=> 0.05). Lyophilized bovine pericardium showed no significant differences in calcification or inflammatory reactions compared to nonlyophilized samples when implanted subcutaneously in rats (P > 0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: