Key result
A survey of 102 Italian physicians across 81 hospitals revealed high inhomogeneity in approaches to temporary transvenous cardiac pacing, including infection prevention and post-procedure management.
Why the study?
Temporary transvenous cardiac pacing has limited coverage in guidelines despite frequent complications, prompting a country-wide assessment of current practice.
Cross-Sectional (n=102)
Yes
A nationwide Italian survey reveals significant heterogeneity in the clinical approaches to temporary transvenous cardiac pacing, highlighting the need for standardized protocols.
High practice variation in TTCP persists; leaves open whether standardized protocols reduce CIED infections.
BACKGROUND: Temporary transvenous cardiac pacing (TTCP) is a standard procedure in current practice, despite limited coverage in consensus guidelines. However, many authors reported several complications associated with TTCP, especially development of infections of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED). The aim of this survey was to provide a country-wide picture of current practice regarding TTCP. METHODS: Data were collected using an online survey that was administered to members of the Italian Association of Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing. RESULTS: We collected data from 102 physicians, working in 81 Italian hospitals from 17/21 regions. Our data evidenced that different strategies are adopted in case of acute bradycardia with a tendency to limit TTCP mainly to advanced atrioventricular block. However, some centers reported a greater use in elective procedures. TTCP is usually performed by electrophysiologists or interventional cardiologists and, differently from previous reports, mainly by a femoral approach and with nonfloating catheters. We found high inhomogeneity regarding prevention of infections and thromboembolic complications and in post-TTCP management, associated with different TTCP volumes and a strategy for management of acute bradyarrhythmias. CONCLUSION: This survey evidenced a high inhomogeneity in the approaches adopted by Italian cardiologists for TTCP. Further studies are needed to explore if these divergences are associated with different long-term outcomes, especially incidence of CIED-related infections.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Diemberger et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Temporary transvenous cardiac pacing (n=102). Temporary transvenous cardiac pacing was evaluated on Current practice regarding TTCP. A survey of 102 Italian physicians across 81 hospitals revealed high inhomogeneity in approaches to temporary transvenous cardiac pacing, including infection prevention and post-procedure management.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: