Why the study?
Data on the use of temporary transvenous cardiac pacing in patients with cardiogenic shock remain limited despite its common use in the intensive care setting.
Does temporary transvenous cardiac pacing improve 30-day survival in patients with cardiogenic shock?
Observational (n=1,561)
Yes
Does temporary transvenous cardiac pacing improve 30-day survival in patients with cardiogenic shock?
Odds Ratio: 2.52 (95% CI 1.54–4.11)
p-value: p=<0.001
In patients with cardiogenic shock, temporary transvenous cardiac pacing is primarily indicated for AMI-related bradycardia and carries a 12% complication rate, but does not significantly alter 30-day survival compared to non-paced patients.
No survival benefit seen with TTP in cardiogenic shock; leaves open efficacy in bradycardic subgroups and requires RCTs before practice change.
Temporary transvenous cardiac pacing (TTP) is commonly used to manage hemodynamically compromising, drug-refractory brady- and tachyarrhythmias in the intensive care setting. Despite previous studies analyzing TTP treatment, data on its use in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) remain limited. This retrospective exploratory analysis aimed to investigate the utilization of TTP in patients experiencing CS, with a particular focus on treatment characteristics, complication rates, predictive factors, and outcomes across different subgroups. We retrospectively included registry data from 184 patients who underwent TTP therapy from 1561 cases of CS treated at the Intensive Care Units (ICUs) of two university hospitals in Germany between 2010 and 2023. Bradycardia due to acute myocardial infarction was the primary indication for TTP implantation in patients with CS. The median duration of TTP therapy was 65 h, during which complications occurred in 12.0% of cases, 3.3% were classified as severe. We found that culprit lesions in the Right Coronary Artery (RCA) were more likely to necessitate TTP treatment in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) (OR 2.52, 95% CI 1.54-4.11, p < 0.001). In non-AMI-CS patients, age (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.05, p < 0.005) and myocarditis (OR 3.21, 95% CI 1.19-8.64, p = 0.02) were associated with a higher incidence of TTP therapy during ICU treatment. Further studies are needed to validate these observations.Trial registration: LMUshock registry (WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform Number DRKS00015860).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Musil et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Cardiogenic shock (n=1,561). Right Coronary Artery (RCA) culprit lesion vs. Non-RCA culprit lesions was evaluated on Necessity for temporary transvenous cardiac pacing (TTP) (OR 2.52, 95% CI 1.54-4.11, p=<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: