Key result
Plasma metabolic profiling identified 124 significantly different metabolites between HFpEF patients and healthy controls, highlighting Cytosine as a potential biomarker and tryptophan metabolism as a novel pathway.
Why the study?
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is characterized by metabolic disturbances with pathophysiological implications, prompting an investigation into plasma metabolic differences.
Does untargeted metabolomic profiling identify distinct plasma metabolic characteristics and potential biomarkers in patients with HFpEF compared to healthy controls?
Case-Control (n=60)
No
Does untargeted metabolomic profiling identify distinct plasma metabolic characteristics and potential biomarkers in patients with HFpEF compared to healthy controls?
p-value: p=<0.05
Untargeted metabolomic profiling identified 124 differentially expressed metabolites in HFpEF patients compared to healthy controls, highlighting tryptophan metabolism and specific biomarkers like cytosine as potential novel pathways and diagnostic targets.
Metabolomic differences in HFpEF may identify pathways; leaves open causal roles and therapeutic relevance pending validation.
Background Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a complex disease characterized by metabolic disturbances that can have various pathophysiological implications. Methods Data were collected from a prospective cohort consisting of 30 HFpEF participants and 30 healthy controls, matched by gender and age. untargeted metabolomic profiling UHPLC-MS/MS was performed on Venous blood. The analyses aimed to reveal the differences in plasma metabolic characteristics between HFpEF participants and healthy controls using untargeted metabolomics. Initial steps included Principal Components Analysis (PCA), Partial Least Squares-Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA), and hierarchical clustering analysis to detect differing compounds groups. Subsequently, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and pathway analysis of the different metabolites. Finally, we performed pathway enrichment analysis to identify significantly dysregulated processes. Results A total of 124 significantly different compounds were selected based on criteria of Variable Importance in Projection (VIP) > 1.0, Fold Change (FC) > 1.2 or FC < 0.833, and P-value < 0.05. Compared to healthy control group, the most altered metabolites in HFpEF were lipids and lipid-like molecules. KEGG enrichment and pathway impact analysis highlight the enrichment of these differentially expressed metabolites primarily in tryptophan metabolism. Hierarchical clustering results, showed varying compound levels between the two groups. ROC curve results, revealed Cytosine and 1,2-dihydroxyheptadec-16-yn-4-yl having higher AUC values. Conclusions Significant differences were observed in plasma metabolic profiles between HFpEF patients and healthy subjects using UHPLC-MS/MS. Cytosine appeared a potential biomarker. Tryptophan metabolism may be a novel metabolic pathway of HFpEF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abudurexiti et al. (2024) conducted a case-control in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (n=60). Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on Differentially expressed plasma metabolites (VIP > 1.0, FC > 1.2 or < 0.833, P < 0.05) (p=<0.05). Plasma metabolic profiling identified 124 significantly different metabolites between HFpEF patients and healthy controls, highlighting Cytosine as a potential biomarker and tryptophan metabolism as a novel pathway.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: