Key result
Patients with dyslipidemia classified into an active latent profile had a significantly higher quality of life compared to those in an inactive profile (Cohen's d 0.49, p=0.001).
Why the study?
Despite the rising prevalence and economic burden of dyslipidemia in South Korea, data regarding physical activity among these patients remained limited.
Does a more active physical profile improve quality of life in patients with dyslipidemia?
Cross-Sectional (n=534)
Does a more active physical profile improve quality of life in patients with dyslipidemia?
Standardized Mean Difference: 0.49
Absolute Event Rate: 0.95% vs 0.86%
p-value: p=0.001
Promoting light physical activity and altering perceived body shape through counseling may improve quality of life in patients with dyslipidemia.
Light PA and positive body shape profiles linked to higher QoL in dyslipidemia; hypothesis-generating for counseling interventions before practice change.
Despite the increasing prevalence and economic burden of dyslipidemia in South Korea, we have little data on the physical activity of patients. Thus, we aimed to investigate how quality of life among patients with dyslipidemia is influenced by a combination of the following variables: light physical activity (PA), sedentary behavior (SB), perceived body shape, and body mass index (BMI). We examined data from the Sixth Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES VI 2015), collected in 2015 by the Korean Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The analysis included 534 individuals with dyslipidemia out of 7380 survey participants. Latent profile analysis identified three latent classes of individuals based on their physical profiles. Class 1 patients (active; n = 48) were more active, possessed more positive views of their body shape, were less sedentary, and had a lower BMI than Class 3 patients (inactive; n = 154). Class 2 patients (moderate; n = 331) had profiles in between the other two classes. Additionally, Class 1 and 2 patients had better quality of life than Class 3 patients. Our results suggest that promoting light PA and altering perceived body shape through counselling may improve quality of life in patients with dyslipidemia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in Dyslipidemia (n=534). Active lifestyle profile (high light physical activity, positive perceived body shape, low sedentary behavior, low BMI) vs. Inactive lifestyle profile was evaluated on Quality of life (EQ-5D index) (Cohen's d 0.49, p=0.001). Patients with dyslipidemia classified into an active latent profile had a significantly higher quality of life compared to those in an inactive profile (Cohen's d 0.49, p=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: