Key result
A web-based systematic collection and reporting system for patient-reported data in chronic heart failure was feasible, achieving response rates consistently above 50%.
Why the study?
To evaluate the feasibility of digital and continuous collection and reporting of patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures for chronic heart failure.
A web-based systematic collection of PROMs and PREMs in chronic heart failure patients is feasible and achieves acceptable response rates, though it may be subject to selection bias regarding age and education.
May support digital PROM collection in selected HF patients; leaves open generalizability due to age and education biases.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility of a digital and continuous collection and reporting of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) for chronic heart failure (CHF). DESIGN: A single-site pilot study was settled for evaluating the feasibility of the intervention, both using qualitative and quantitative data (ie, workshop, surveys). SETTING: The pilot has been implemented in a Tuscan specialised hospital (Italy). PARTICIPANTS: 162 patients were involved. Inclusion criteria were: a previous diagnosis of HF, age ≥18 years, absence of cognitive impairment or active tumours, ability to provide informed consent to study participation. INTERVENTION: The continuous collection and reporting of PROMs and PREMs has been designed and implemented in 2018. PREMs questionnaires for patients were developed, while Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12 was used for assessing PROMs. Questionnaires are administered at specific time points: discharge; 30 days, 7 and 12 months after the discharge. Enrolment of patients, administration and real-time reporting of questionnaires are carried on through a digital platform. OUTCOME MEASURES: Enrolment, response and drop-out rates were considered to assess the feasibility of the intervention. Qualitative data were collected during meetings and workshops with health workers. The representativeness of the recruited sample with respect to the population characteristics was also evaluated. RESULTS: The system has been successfully implemented during 2018. Response rates have been consistently above 50%, demonstrating patients' transversal willingness to participate. All the involved stakeholders acknowledged the feasibility of the design. The recruited sample is significantly different in terms of age and educational level compared with the overall population characteristics. CONCLUSION: It is possible to run a web-based systematic collection and reporting system for CHF patient-reported data. Systematic collection and reporting of PROMs and PREMs data allows professionals to increasingly assume CHF patient perspective in their daily work. Limitations will be used to improve the system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pennucci et al. (2020) studied chronic heart failure (n=162). Web-based systematic collection and reporting of PROMs and PREMs was evaluated on Feasibility (enrolment, response and drop-out rates). A web-based systematic collection and reporting system for patient-reported data in chronic heart failure was feasible, achieving response rates consistently above 50%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: