Key result
Successful tracheal intubation using the Airtraq laryngoscope requires centering the glottic opening and positioning the inter-arytenoid cleft medially below the horizontal line in the view.
Why the study?
Does specific positioning of the Airtraq laryngoscope improve tracheal intubation success in anaesthetised patients?
Observational (n=50)
Does specific positioning of the Airtraq laryngoscope improve tracheal intubation success in anaesthetised patients?
Specific positioning of the glottic opening and inter-arytenoid cleft is required for successful tracheal intubation using the Airtraq laryngoscope.
May support targeted glottic views to improve Airtraq success; hypothesis-generating from cohort data and requires RCT confirmation.
In this study we have used a video-recording, retrospective analysis technique to evaluate the influence of the Airtraq laryngoscope manipulations and the resulting changes in position of the glottic opening and inter-arytenoids cleft, on the success rate of tracheal intubation. The video recordings of the internal views of 109 tracheal intubation attempts, in 50 anaesthetised patients were analysed. We demonstrated that successful tracheal intubation using the Airtraq laryngoscope require the glottic opening to be centred in the view, and positioning the inter-arytenoid cleft medially below the horizontal line in the centre of the view. We also demonstrated that repositioning of the Airtraq laryngoscope following a failed tracheal intubation attempt required the performance of a standard series of manoeuvres.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dhonneur et al. (2009) conducted an observational in Anaesthetised patients requiring tracheal intubation (n=50). Airtraq laryngoscope manipulations was evaluated on Success rate of tracheal intubation. Successful tracheal intubation using the Airtraq laryngoscope requires centering the glottic opening and positioning the inter-arytenoid cleft medially below the horizontal line in the view.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: