Key result
Mini-Incision Open Appendectomy was associated with a significantly higher odds of prolonged hospital stay (>3 days) compared to laparoscopic appendectomy (OR 3.316).
Why the study?
Although quick recovery is expected after appendectomy, hospitalization can be prolonged in clinical practice, raising questions about which factors affect length of stay.
Does laparoscopic appendectomy reduce hospital length of stay compared to mini-incision open appendectomy in adult patients with acute appendicitis?
Observational (n=446)
No
Does laparoscopic appendectomy reduce hospital length of stay compared to mini-incision open appendectomy in adult patients with acute appendicitis?
Odds Ratio: 3.316 (95% CI 2.074–5.3)
Absolute Event Rate: 76.4% vs 54.6%
p-value: p=<0.001
Laparoscopic appendectomy, lower preoperative CRP, and uncomplicated appendicitis are significant predictors of a shorter hospital length of stay (≤3 days) following emergency appendectomy.
Laparoscopic appendectomy may shorten LOS versus mini-incision open; leaves open whether it should replace open approaches in all settings.
Background: Appendectomies are interesting because they are the most common emergency abdominal operations, they are considered simple procedures, and the imperative is a quick recovery measured by hospital length of stay (LOS). However, this is not always the case in clinical practice, hospitalization can be prolonged, and the question is what factors affect it. Methods: A multivariant logistic model of LOS predictors analyzed from the clinical data of 446 patients who underwent appendectomy at the Clinic for Emergency Surgery, Belgrade. The patients were divided into Short LOS group (SLOS hospital stay ≤3 days, 157 patients) and Long LOS group (LLOS hospital stay >3 days, 289 patients). Results: Significant differences were found between SLOS and LLOS groups in age (p<0.001), comorbidities (p=0.001), preoperative WBC (p = 0.004); preoperative CRP (p < 0.001); peritonitis (p < 0.001), using ≥ 2 antibiotics (p < 0.001), complicated appendicitis (p < 0.001), surgical time (P < 0.001). No significant difference was found concerning gender, postoperative WBC, CRP, and complications (p>0.05). Patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy (LAP) had a statistically significantly shorter hospitalization time compared to those who underwent Mini-Incision Open Appendectomy (MIOA) (p < 0.001). The multivariate logistic model found three statistically significant predictors of longer hospitalization: CRP preoperatively (B=0.006, p=0.047), OR=1.006, the type of surgery (B=1.199; p<0.001), OR=3.3 complicated appendicitis (B=0.762; p=0.003), OR=2.142. Conclusion: Surgical approach has statistically the most significant impact on LOS. Laparoscopic appendectomy is superior to Mini-Incision Open Appendectomy concerning the hospital LOS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Doklestić et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Acute appendicitis (n=446). Mini-Incision Open Appendectomy (MIOA) vs. Laparoscopic Appendectomy (LAP) was evaluated on Hospital length of stay > 3 days (OR 3.316, 95% CI 2.074-5.300, p=<0.001). Mini-Incision Open Appendectomy was associated with a significantly higher odds of prolonged hospital stay (>3 days) compared to laparoscopic appendectomy (OR 3.316).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: