Key result
In hypercholesterolemic mice, the vasoprotective effects of the nitroxyl donor IPA/NO were maintained without developing tolerance, whereas tolerance developed to GTN (P<0.001).
Why the study?
Does the nitroxyl donor IPA/NO improve vasorelaxation and inhibit platelet aggregation compared to GTN in hypercholesterolemic mice?
Does the nitroxyl donor IPA/NO improve vasorelaxation and inhibit platelet aggregation compared to GTN in hypercholesterolemic mice?
The nitroxyl donor IPA/NO maintains its vasoprotective and antiaggregatory effects in hypercholesterolemia without developing tolerance, unlike the traditional NO donor GTN.
Supports exploration of nitroxyl donors to avoid GTN tolerance in hypercholesterolemia; leaves open human translation.
Nitroxyl (HNO) displays pharmacological and therapeutic actions distinct from those of its redox sibling nitric oxide (NO(•)). It remains unclear, however, whether the vasoprotective actions of HNO are preserved in disease. The ability of the HNO donor isopropylamine NONOate (IPA/NO) to induce vasorelaxation, its susceptibility to tolerance development, and antiaggregatory actions were compared with those of a clinically used NO(•) donor, glyceryl trinitrate (GTN), in hypercholesterolemic mice. The vasorelaxant and antiaggregatory properties of IPA/NO and GTN were examined in isolated carotid arteries and washed platelets, respectively, from male C57BL/6J mice [wild-type (WT)] maintained on either a normal diet (WT-ND) or high fat diet (WT-HFD; 7 wk) as well as apolipoprotein E-deficient mice maintained on a HFD (ApoE(-/-)-HFD; 7 wk). In WT-ND mice, IPA/NO (0.1-30 μmol/l) induced concentration-dependent vasorelaxation and inhibition of collagen (30 μg/ml)-stimulated platelet aggregation, which was predominantly soluble guanylyl cyclase/cGMP dependent. Compared with WT-HFD mice, ApoE(-/-)-HFD mice displayed an increase in total plasma cholesterol levels (P < 0.001), vascular (P < 0.05) and platelet (P < 0.05) superoxide (O(2)(·-)) production, and reduced endogenous NO(•) bioavailability (P < 0.001). Vasorelaxant responses to both IPA/NO and GTN were preserved in hypercholesterolemia, whereas vascular tolerance developed to GTN (P < 0.001) but not to IPA/NO. The ability of IPA/NO (3 μmol/l) to inhibit platelet aggregation was preserved in hypercholesterolemia, whereas the actions of GTN (100 μmol/l) were abolished. In conclusion, the vasoprotective effects of IPA/NO were maintained in hypercholesterolemia and, thus, HNO donors may represent future novel treatments for vascular diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bullen et al. (2011) studied Hypercholesterolemia. Isopropylamine NONOate (IPA/NO) vs. Glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) was evaluated on Vasorelaxation and inhibition of platelet aggregation. In hypercholesterolemic mice, the vasoprotective effects of the nitroxyl donor IPA/NO were maintained without developing tolerance, whereas tolerance developed to GTN (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More on Dual antiplatelet therapyMore from AJP Heart and Circulatory Physiology