Key result
Indapamide/perindopril single-pill combination significantly decreased the arterial stiffness index from 153.5 to 138.3 (P<0.001) and improved blood pressure parameters over 12 weeks.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to investigate the impact of an indapamide/perindopril single-pill combination on arterial stiffness parameters, blood pressure level, and blood pressure variability in middle-aged patients with stage II grade 1-2 essential arterial hypertension.
Does a single-pill combination of indapamide and perindopril improve arterial stiffness and blood pressure parameters in treatment-naive patients with essential arterial hypertension?
Cohort (n=52)
Does a single-pill combination of indapamide and perindopril improve arterial stiffness and blood pressure parameters in treatment-naive patients with essential arterial hypertension?
In treatment-naive patients with essential arterial hypertension, a single-pill combination of indapamide and perindopril effectively controls blood pressure and improves arterial stiffness parameters.
May reduce arterial stiffness in treatment-naive hypertension; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
OBJECTIVE: to investigate the impact of indapamide / perindopril single-pill combination (I / P SPC) on arterial stiffness parameters, blood pressure (BP) level and BP variability (BPV) in middle-aged patients with stage II grade 1-2 essential arterial hypertension (EAH). Materials and methods. We retrospectively formed a group of patients with stage II grade 1-2 EAH who had not previously received regular antihypertensive therapy (AHT) (n=52, mean age 52.9±6.0 years). All patients were treated with I / P SPC and all of them achieved target office BP level (less than 140 / 90 mm Hg). After 12 weeks of follow-up (from the time of reaching the target BP) assessment of AHT effectiveness (general clinical data, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring [ABPM], volume sphygmography, echocardiography), and vascular stiffness evaluation were performed. RESULTS: At the end of follow-up office systolic BP (SBP), diastolic BP (DBP), pulse BP, day-time, night-time and 24‑hour SBP and DBP significantly (p<0.001 for all) decreased. According to the ABPM data day-time, nighttime, and 24‑hour systolic BPV significantly decreased (p=0.029, p=0.006 and p<0.001, respectively); day-time and 24‑hour diastolic BPV also significantly decreased (p=0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). Day-night standard deviation (SDdn) significantly decreased too (p=0.002 and p<0.001, respectively). Volumetric sphygmography showed significant decrease of right cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) (from 8.20±1.29 to 7.58±1.44, p=0.001) and of left CAVI (from 8.13±1.40 to 7.46±1.43, p<0.001), as well as reduction of the number o f patients with a right- and / or left-CAVI >9.0 (from 32.7 to 11.5 %, p=0.018). According to assessment of arterial stiffness using the Vasotens24 software package, the arterial stiffness index (ASI) significantly (p<0.001) decreased from 153.5±29.9 to 138.3±20.0 (by -9.2±13.1 %). Transthoracic echocardiography data demonstrated significant decrease (p<0.001) in effective arterial elastance (from 1.82±0.43 to 1.58±0.36 mm Hg; by -11.85±16.29 %) and significant (p<0.001) increase in the arterial compliance - from 1.27±0.34 to 1.54±0.38 mm Hg / ml (+26.95±38.06 %). CONCLUSION: In AHT naive patients 40-65 years old with stage II grade 1-2 EAH therapy with I / P SPC provided effective 24‑hour BP control, reduced BPV and improved arterial stiffness parameters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Борисова et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in stage II grade 1-2 essential arterial hypertension (n=52). Indapamide / perindopril single-pill combination was evaluated on arterial stiffness parameters, blood pressure (BP) level and BP variability (BPV) (p=<0.001). Indapamide/perindopril single-pill combination significantly decreased the arterial stiffness index from 153.5 to 138.3 (P<0.001) and improved blood pressure parameters over 12 weeks.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: