Key result
Impaired heart rate recovery during exercise treadmill testing was associated with a significantly higher risk of developing new-onset atrial fibrillation compared to normal recovery (HR 1.43).
Why the study?
Does impaired heart rate recovery during exercise treadmill testing predict the development of new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients without prior AF?
Cohort (n=8,236)
No
Does impaired heart rate recovery during exercise treadmill testing predict the development of new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients without prior AF?
Hazard Ratio: 1.43 (95% CI 1.06–1.93)
Absolute Event Rate: 4.1% vs 1.6%
p-value: p=<0.0001
Impaired heart rate recovery during exercise treadmill testing is an independent predictor of new-onset atrial fibrillation, supporting the hypothesis that autonomic dysfunction mediates AF development.
Should not alter AF risk stratification; leaves open whether heart rate recovery improves prediction beyond established factors.
BACKGROUND: Autonomic dysfunction appears to play a significant role in the development of atrial fibrillation (AF), and impaired heart rate recovery (HRR) during exercise treadmill testing (ETT) is a known marker for autonomic dysfunction. However, whether impaired HRR is associated with incident AF is unknown. We studied the association of impaired HRR with the development of incident AF, after controlling for demographic and clinical confounders. METHODS: We studied 8236 patients referred for ETT between 2001 and 2004, and without a prior history of AF. Patients were categorized by normal or impaired HRR on ETT. The primary outcome was the development of AF. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to control for demographic and clinical characteristics. Secondary analyses exploring a continuous relationship between impaired HRR and AF, and exploring interactions between cardiac medication use, HRR, and AF were also conducted. RESULTS: After adjustment, patients with impaired HRR were more likely to develop AF than patients with normal HRR (HR 1.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06, 1.93). In addition, there was a linear trend between impaired HRR and AF (HR 1.05 for each decreasing BPM in HRR, 95% CI 0.99, 1.11). No interactions between cardiac medications, HRR, and AF were noted. CONCLUSION: Patients with impaired HRR on ETT were more likely to develop new-onset AF, as compared to patients with normal HRR. These findings support the hypothesis that autonomic dysfunction mediates the development of AF, and suggest that interventions known to improve HRR, such as exercise training, may delay or prevent AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maddox et al. (2009) conducted a cohort in Patients referred for exercise treadmill testing without prior atrial fibrillation (n=8,236). Impaired heart rate recovery (HRR) vs. Normal heart rate recovery was evaluated on Development of new-onset atrial fibrillation (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.06, 1.93, p=<0.0001). Impaired heart rate recovery during exercise treadmill testing was associated with a significantly higher risk of developing new-onset atrial fibrillation compared to normal recovery (HR 1.43).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: