Key result
Chronic nicotine exposure impaired proangiogenic function in human umbilical vein endothelial cells compared with acute exposure, but sustained the antiapoptotic effect.
Why the study?
Does chronic nicotine exposure alter angiogenic activity in human umbilical vein endothelial cells compared to acute exposure?
Does chronic nicotine exposure alter angiogenic activity in human umbilical vein endothelial cells compared to acute exposure?
Chronic nicotine exposure impairs proangiogenic function in endothelial cells, which may contribute to the vascular pathophysiology seen in chronic smokers.
May contribute to vascular dysfunction in chronic smokers; hypothesis-generating and requires in vivo validation before clinical translation.
The pathogenic mechanism of nicotine, a major product of smoking, on vascular endothelial cells is not well defined yet. The purpose of this study was to determine whether chronic exposure to nicotine alters angiogenic activity in human umbilical vein endothelial cells and to identify a potential role for endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) expression. Our study demonstrated that acute nicotine treatment enhanced nitric oxide release, eNOS activation, and proangiogenic activity. However, chronic nicotine exposure impaired proangiogenic function (decreased cell migration and tubular structure formation) in human umbilical vein endothelial cells compared with acute exposure, but sustained the antiapoptotic effect. These findings seem to be related to eNOS gene expression and nitric oxide production, which may be involved in the pathophysiology of chronic nicotine addicts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2011) studied this question. Chronic nicotine exposure vs. Acute nicotine exposure was evaluated on Proangiogenic function (cell migration and tubular structure formation). Chronic nicotine exposure impaired proangiogenic function in human umbilical vein endothelial cells compared with acute exposure, but sustained the antiapoptotic effect.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: