Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cohort study reveals high long-term joint survival after Chiari pelvic osteotomy in young patients, indicating the anti-Chiari effect stems from insufficient coverage rather than growth plate injury.
Several authors observed a loss of correction after performing Chiari pelvic osteotomy (CPO) in young patients. Hence, the aim of this study was to answer two questions: (1) Does the Chiari pelvic osteotomy affect the development of the acetabulum in skeletally immature patients in the long term? (2) Is there any evidence of the previously described "Anti-Chiari" effect after a mean follow-up of 36 years? Data from 21 patients (27 hips) undergoing CPO before the age of 16 years were clinically assessed, and the evolution of radiological parameters over time was analyzed. The mean age at CPO was 11.2 years (±3; 4.4-15.7). The 20- and 30-year survival rates of the CPO were 100% and 92.6%, respectively. Mean postoperative medialization was 54% (±18; 23-99). The average osteotomy angle was 11° (±7; 2-28). No significant changes were found for the center-edge angle (CEA) and acetabular index (AI) over time; the angle of Idelberger and Frank (ACM) almost reached normal values at follow-up (FU); for the acetabular-head index (AHI), a slight shift toward the initial situation could be detected. The morphology of the acetabulum remained unchanged over time. The "Anti-Chiari effect" seems to be primarily caused by insufficient coverage of the femoral head rather than damage to the apophysis due to surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schneider et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: