Key result
Personalised external aortic root support for aortic root dilatation resulted in 0 ascending aortic dissections over 596 postoperative patient-years.
Why the study?
Data were needed on the safety and postoperative incidence of aortic events following personalised external aortic root support (PEARS) to stabilise a dilated aortic root and prevent dissection.
Does personalised external aortic root support (PEARS) prevent aortic dissection safely in patients with aortic root dilatation?
Cohort (n=200)
Yes
Does personalised external aortic root support (PEARS) prevent aortic dissection safely in patients with aortic root dilatation?
PEARS appears effective in preventing aortic dissection in the short-to-medium term for patients with aortic root dilatation, though coronary complications highlight a learning curve.
Supports PEARS evaluation in aortic dilatation; leaves open its role versus alternatives without randomized trials.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In personalised external aortic root support (PEARS), a custom-made, macroporous mesh is used to stabilise a dilated aortic root and prevent dissection, primarily in patients with genetically driven aortopathies. Data are needed on the safety and postoperative incidence of aortic events. METHODS: We present a multicentre cohort study evaluating the first 200 consecutive patients (median age 33 years) undergoing surgery with an intention to perform PEARS for aortic root dilatation in 23 centres between 2004 and 2019. Perioperative outcomes were collected prospectively while clinical follow-up was retrieved retrospectively. Median follow-up was 21.2 months. RESULTS: The main indication was Marfan syndrome (73.5%) and the most frequent concomitant procedure was mitral valve repair (10%). An intervention for myocardial ischaemia or coronary injury was needed in 11 patients, 1 case resulting in perioperative death. No ascending aortic dissections were observed in 596 documented postoperative patient years. Late reoperation was performed in 3 patients for operator failure to achieve complete mesh coverage. Among patients with at least mild aortic regurgitation (AR) preoperatively, 68% had no or trivial AR at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the clinical history of the first 200 patients to undergo PEARS. To date, aortic dissection has not been observed in the restrained part of the aorta, yet long-term follow-up is needed to confirm the potential of PEARS to prevent dissection. While operative mortality is low, the reported coronary complications reflect the learning curve of aortic root surgery in patients with connective tissue disease. PEARS may stabilise or reduce aortic regurgitation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hoof et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in aortic root dilatation (n=200). Personalised external aortic root support (PEARS) was evaluated on ascending aortic dissections. Personalised external aortic root support for aortic root dilatation resulted in 0 ascending aortic dissections over 596 postoperative patient-years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: