Key result
Arch anastomoses sparing the supraaortic vessels resulted in shorter periods of circulatory arrest (17.2 min) compared to tubular arch replacement (33.7 min).
Why the study?
Does arch anastomosis sparing the supraaortic vessels reduce circulatory arrest time and cerebral complications compared to tubular arch replacement in patients undergoing aortic arch operations?
Observational (n=204)
Does arch anastomosis sparing the supraaortic vessels reduce circulatory arrest time and cerebral complications compared to tubular arch replacement in patients undergoing aortic arch operations?
Absolute Event Rate: 17.2% vs 33.7%
Arch anastomoses sparing the supraaortic vessels reduces circulatory arrest time compared to tubular arch replacement, supporting a less radical approach in acute dissections.
May shorten arrest in select cases; hypothesis-generating case report that leaves open cerebral outcomes and requires prospective validation.
Operations on the nondissected and dissected aortic arch still pose challenges in terms of the need for and extent of aortic replacement. Our approaches to these lesions are described against the background of 204 operations (58 aneurysms, 54 chronic dissections, and 92 acute dissections), in terms of cerebral protection, procedural choices, and operative technique. Arch anastomoses sparing the supraaortic vessels had shorter periods of circulatory arrest (17.2 min) when compared to tubular arch replacement, with insertion of some or all of these vessels (33.7 min). Early death rates due to cerebral complications were lowest in acute dissections (3/14 fatalities, with two patients showing preoperative cerebral compromise). Based on our experience, we recommend doing subtotal or total arch replacement in aneurysms regardless of cause. Radical arch surgery should be avoided in acute dissections whenever feasible. Instead, the arch should be explored and a blood-tight distal anastomosis made, going beyond any entry tears encountered in that aortic portion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Borst et al. (1994) conducted an observational in Aortic arch lesions (aneurysms and dissections) (n=204). Arch anastomoses sparing the supraaortic vessels vs. Tubular arch replacement with insertion of some or all supraaortic vessels was evaluated on Periods of circulatory arrest (minutes). Arch anastomoses sparing the supraaortic vessels resulted in shorter periods of circulatory arrest (17.2 min) compared to tubular arch replacement (33.7 min).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: