Key result
An IABP/CP combination significantly increased pulse pressure compared to CP alone (54.9 vs 9.1 mm Hg; p=0.012) in a cardiac-arrested pig model.
Why the study?
Does a combined IABP/CP improve pulsatility (EEP and SHE) compared to CP alone in cardiac-arrested pigs?
Does a combined IABP/CP improve pulsatility (EEP and SHE) compared to CP alone in cardiac-arrested pigs?
Absolute Event Rate: 54.9% vs 9.1%
p-value: p=0.012
In a cardiac-arrested pig model, combining an IABP with a centrifugal pump significantly improves pulsatility, energy equivalent pressure, and surplus hemodynamic energy compared to a centrifugal pump alone.
Does not support clinical adoption of IABP/CP combinations; leaves open translation of pulsatility gains to human cardiac arrest.
We examined the pulsatility generated by an intra-aortic balloon pump/centrifugal pump (IABP/CP) combination in terms of energy equivalent pressure (EEP) and surplus hemodynamic energy (SHE). In five cardiac-arrested pigs, the outflow cannula of the CP was inserted into the ascending aorta, the inflow cannula in the right atrium. A 30-ml IABP was subsequently placed in the descending aorta. Extracorporeal circulation was maintained for 30 minutes using a pump flow of 75 ml/kg per minute by CP alone or by IABP/CP with pressure and flow measured in the right internal carotid artery. The IABP/CP combination converted the flow to pulsatile and increased pulse pressure significantly from 9.1 +/- 1.3 mm Hg to 54.9 +/- 6.1 mm Hg (p = 0.012). It also significantly increased the percent change from mean arterial pressure to EEP from 0.2 +/- 0.3% to 23.3 +/- 6.1% (p = 0.012) and SHE from 133.2 +/- 234.5 erg/cm to 20,219.8 +/- 5842.7 erg/cm3 (p = 0.012). However, no statistical difference was observed between CP and IABP/CP in terms of mean carotid artery pressure (p = NS). In a cardiac-arrested animal model, pulsatility generated by a IABP/CP combination may be effective in terms of energy equivalent pressure and surplus hemodynamic energy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lim et al. (2006) studied Cardiac arrest (n=5). Intra-aortic balloon pump/centrifugal pump (IABP/CP) combination vs. Centrifugal pump (CP) alone was evaluated on Pulse pressure (p=0.012). An IABP/CP combination significantly increased pulse pressure compared to CP alone (54.9 vs 9.1 mm Hg; p=0.012) in a cardiac-arrested pig model.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: