Key result
RNase III regulates MicA in a target-coupled way when in complex with mRNAs, while RNase E cleaves unpaired MicA, demonstrating two independent pathways for MicA turnover.
Demonstrates two independent pathways for MicA turnover in Salmonella, with RNase III acting in a target-dependent manner similar to eukaryotic RNAi systems.
Reveals dual RNase pathways for bacterial sRNA turnover; leaves open conservation across species and any translational relevance.
MicA is a trans-encoded small non-coding RNA, which downregulates porin-expression in stationary-phase. In this work, we focus on the role of endoribonucleases III and E on Salmonella typhimurium sRNA MicA regulation. RNase III is shown to regulate MicA in a target-coupled way, while RNase E is responsible for the control of free MicA levels in the cell. We purified both Salmonella enzymes and demonstrated that in vitro RNase III is only active over MicA when in complex with its targets (whether ompA or lamB mRNAs). In vivo, MicA is demonstrated to be cleaved by RNase III in a coupled way with ompA mRNA. On the other hand, RNase E is able to cleave unpaired MicA and does not show a marked dependence on its 5' phosphorylation state. The main conclusion of this work is the existence of two independent pathways for MicA turnover. Each pathway involves a distinct endoribonuclease, having a different role in the context of the fine-tuned regulation of porin levels. Cleavage of MicA by RNase III in a target-dependent fashion, with the concomitant decay of the mRNA target, strongly resembles the eukaryotic RNAi system, where RNase III-like enzymes play a pivotal role.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Viegas et al. (2010) studied Salmonella typhimurium sRNA MicA regulation. RNase III and RNase E was evaluated on MicA cleavage and regulation. RNase III regulates MicA in a target-coupled way when in complex with mRNAs, while RNase E cleaves unpaired MicA, demonstrating two independent pathways for MicA turnover.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: