Key result
The first 2 hours of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring were associated with significantly elevated systolic and diastolic blood pressure compared to the second day of monitoring.
Why the study?
Does the first 24-hour period of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring yield higher blood pressure readings compared to the second 24-hour period in hypertensive patients?
Observational (n=50)
Does the first 24-hour period of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring yield higher blood pressure readings compared to the second 24-hour period in hypertensive patients?
The first 2 hours of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring are associated with artificially elevated blood pressure, suggesting that 26-hour monitoring with exclusion of the first 2 hours may improve diagnostic accuracy.
May warrant excluding initial ABPM hours from analysis; hypothesis-generating for refined protocols pending validation.
Objective and design Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is being used increasingly in clinical practice and hypertension research. We have noted elevated blood pressure during the initial hours of monitoring. The objective of the present study was to examine the consistency, magnitude and duration of this elevation, and to determine whether this effect causes significant differences in the mean ambulatory blood pressure monitoring values comparing the first (day 1) and second (day 2) consecutive 24-h periods of monitoring. Methods Fifty patients who were hypertensive based on repeated clinic readings were studied prospectively. Each underwent continuous 48-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring with a SpaceLabs 90207 monitor. The device recorded blood pressure at 15-min intervals during the daytime (0600–2159 h) and at 30-min intervals at night-time (2200–0559 h). From these readings hourly means were calculated. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was performed to compare the hourly means of days 1 and 2. Results Repeated-measures analysis of variance indicated that a significant difference existed for both systolic and diastolic blood pressure between day 1 and day 2. Paired Student's t-test revealed that this difference occurred during the first 2 h of monitoring. The daytime blood pressure was higher on day 1 as a result of the initial elevation of blood pressure at the onset of monitoring. The initial elevation of blood pressure was present both in white-coat hypertensives and in essential hypertensives. Conclusion The first 2 h of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring are associated with elevated blood pressure both in white-coat hypertensives and in essential hypertensives. This has a minor effect on mean daytime and 24-h ambulatory blood pressures. We propose that improved ambulatory blood pressure monitoring recordings would be obtained in clinical practice, and more particularly in research applications, if 26-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was carried out, excluding the first 2 h from the summary analyses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prasad et al. (1995) conducted an observational in Hypertension (n=50). First 2 hours of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring vs. Subsequent hours of monitoring (day 2) was evaluated on Difference in hourly mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure between day 1 and day 2. The first 2 hours of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring were associated with significantly elevated systolic and diastolic blood pressure compared to the second day of monitoring.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: