Key result
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring elicited a significant pressor effect during the first 10 hours of the first day compared to the second day (P<0.001), which diminished in successive sessions.
Why the study?
Does ambulatory blood pressure monitoring induce a pressor effect that decreases over successive sessions in hypertensive patients?
Observational (n=823)
Does ambulatory blood pressure monitoring induce a pressor effect that decreases over successive sessions in hypertensive patients?
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring induces a significant pressor effect during the first 10 hours of use, which diminishes but does not disappear in successive sessions, highlighting a novelty effect that should be considered in clinical practice.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Initial ABPM readings may overestimate BP; leaves open whether repeated sessions enhance accuracy in hypertension assessment.
OBJECTIVES: Previous results have indicated that ambulatory monitoring provides a pressor effect on patients using the device for the first time, but not on successive sessions of monitoring. Our objective was to validate and quantify the extent and duration of this pressor effect in hypertensive patients repeatedly evaluated every few months. METHODS: We studied 823 mild-to-moderate hypertensive subjects (347 men), 53.4 +/- 14.1 years of age. Blood pressure was measured at 20-min intervals during the day and at 30-min intervals at night for 48 consecutive hours, and physical activity was simultaneously evaluated every minute with a wrist actigraph. Forty per cent of the patients were evaluated twice or more. RESULTS: In patients evaluated for the first time, results indicated a highly statistically significant (P < 0.001) reduction during the second day of monitoring as compared to the first in the diurnal mean of systolic and diastolic blood pressure, but not in heart rate or physical activity. This pressor effect remained statistically significant for the first 10 h of monitoring, independent of gender, day of the week of monitoring, or number of antihypertensive drugs used by the patients. The nocturnal mean of blood pressure was, however, similar between both days of sampling. This 'ambulatory monitoring effect' was diminished, although not eliminated, in extent and duration for successive sessions of ambulatory monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory monitoring for 48 h revealed a statistically significant pressor response that could mostly reflect a novelty effect in the use of the monitoring device. This effect has marked implications in both research and clinical daily practice for a proper diagnosis of hypertension and evaluation of treatment efficacy by the use of ambulatory monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Calvo et al. (2003) conducted an observational in Mild-to-moderate hypertension (n=823). Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) vs. Second day of monitoring vs first day, and successive sessions was evaluated on Diurnal mean of systolic and diastolic blood pressure (p=<0.001). Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring elicited a significant pressor effect during the first 10 hours of the first day compared to the second day (P<0.001), which diminished in successive sessions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: