Key result
ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction was associated with significantly larger resting perfusion defects compared to non-ST elevation MI (17.1% vs 6.5%, P<0.001).
Why the study?
The study evaluated changes in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy according to the nature of infarction (STEMI vs NSTEMI) and the presence or absence of Diabetes mellitus.
Does the presence of ST-segment elevation or Diabetes mellitus impact myocardial perfusion scintigraphy findings in patients with myocardial infarction?
Observational (n=124)
Does the presence of ST-segment elevation or Diabetes mellitus impact myocardial perfusion scintigraphy findings in patients with myocardial infarction?
In patients with myocardial infarction, ST-segment elevation, but not diabetes mellitus, is associated with larger perfusion defects and lower ejection fraction on myocardial perfusion scintigraphy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
ST-elevation associates with worse MPS parameters post-MI; should not yet alter interpretation pending prospective validation.
Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) is frequently used in the evaluation of patients with coronary artery disease, either stable or with the prior remote acute coronary syndrome. The goal of the present work was to evaluate changes in MPS according to the nature of the infarction (ST-elevation vs non-ST elevation status) as well as according to the presence or absence of Diabetes mellitus. A prospective study of 124 consecutive patients with myocardial infarction (MI) was carried out using MPS. Patients with ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI) had significantly larger values both for percentage and absolute areas of perfusion defects, both at rest and in a stress situation, when compared to patients without ST-segment elevation (NSTEMI). These patients had significantly lower values for left ventricular ejection fractions (EF), in a similar comparison. The values for perfusion defects at rest for STEMI patients were more than double the values for NSTEMI patients (17.1 ± 14.6% vs 6.5 ± 7.8%, P< .001). Concerning resting left ventricular EF, STEMI patients had a mean value of 47.6 ± 13.6% and NSTEMI patients had a mean value of 53.2 ± 12.4% (P.026). Regarding the comparison between patients with and without Diabetes mellitus, none of the parameters under study showed significant differences. Linear regression analysis, taking the percentage of perfusion defect, as the dependent variable, yielded an overall significant result, however, only ST-segment elevation was shown to have an individually significant result. We conclude that the presence of ST-segment elevation but not the presence of Diabetes mellitus is associated with different patterns of MPS in patients with MI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barbosa et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Myocardial infarction (n=124). ST-segment elevation vs. Non-ST segment elevation was evaluated on Perfusion defects at rest (p=<.001). ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction was associated with significantly larger resting perfusion defects compared to non-ST elevation MI (17.1% vs 6.5%, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: