Key result
Dynamic exercise induced significant decreases in mean pulse transit times at the ear, forehead, and finger (-40%, -36%, and -17%, respectively) and synchronized their modulations.
Why the study?
The study aimed to investigate the beat-to-beat relationships among PTTs and PATs measured at finger, ear, and forehead districts, and their links with continuous finger blood pressure and IVCT.
Observational (n=22)
No
Pulse transit times measured at different vascular districts show district-dependent changes under stress and do not always depend directly on beat-to-beat blood pressure, highlighting the complexity of using PTT for cuffless blood pressure estimation.
PTT site-dependence under exercise cautions against direct cuffless BP models; leaves open multi-site validation needs.
This study investigates the beat-to-beat relationships among Pulse Transit Times (PTTs) and Pulse Arrival Times (PATs) concomitantly measured from the heart to finger, ear and forehead vascular districts, and their links with continuous finger blood pressure and isovolumic contraction time (IVCT). These aspects were explored in 22 young volunteers at rest and during cold pressure test (CPT, thermal stress), handgrip (HG, isometric exercise) and cyclo-ergometer pedalling (CYC, dynamic exercise). The starting point of the PTT measures was detected by the seismocardiogram. Results indicate that PTTs measured at the ear, forehead and finger districts are uncorrelated each other at rest, and during CPT and HG. The stressors produced district-dependent changes in the PTT variability. Only the dynamic exercise was able to induce significant changes with respect to rest in the PTTs mean values (-40%, -36% and -17%, respectively for PTTear, PTTfore, PTTfinger), and synchronize their modulations. Similar trends were observed in the PATs. IVCT decreased during the application of stressors with a minimum at CYC (-25%) reflecting an augmented heart contractility. The increase in blood pressure (BP) at CPT was greater than that at CYC (137 vs. 128 mmHg), but the correlations between beat-to-beat transit times and BP were maximal at CYC (PAT showed a higher correlation than PTT; correlations were greater for systolic than for diastolic BP). This suggests that pulse transit times do not always depend directly on the beat-to-beat BP values but, under specific conditions, on other factors and mechanisms that concomitantly also influence BP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2021 study conducted an observational in Healthy (n=22). Physiological stressors (cold pressure test, handgrip, cyclo-ergometer pedalling) vs. Rest was evaluated on Changes in Pulse Transit Times (PTTs) and their correlations. Dynamic exercise induced significant decreases in mean pulse transit times at the ear, forehead, and finger (-40%, -36%, and -17%, respectively) and synchronized their modulations.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: