Background: Cutaneous leishmaniasis is a major public health problem as a disease endemic in Iraqi population. Many diagnostic tools are used to establish the diagnosis like smear, histopathology and culture. Objectives: To find more rapid, sensitive and specific diagnostic method, to establish the diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Patients and methods: Sixty patients with clinical diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis were included in present work during the period between December / 2012 to May / 2013 in Department of Dermatology in Baghdad Teaching Hospital, Al-Yarmook Teaching Hospital and Al-Karama Teaching Hospital and Microbiology Department in collage of Medicine / University of Baghdad. The following diagnostic techniques were carried out for diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis including dental broach smear, histopathology examination and culture on Roswell park medium institute (RPM I 1640) and on NNN media. In addition to PCR technique was performed for all patients. Sixty patients with other skin lesions were processed for PCR as a control group. Results: Sixty patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis, 39 males and 21 females with range age from 6 months to 55 years with a median 24 years. The results of diagnostic techniques were as follow: dental broach smear positive in 41 (68.33%), histopathology in 6(27.27%), culture in 45(75%) and the PCR positive in 55 (91.66%) patients. By PCR,the study differentiated Leishmania major (60%) and Leishmania tropica (40%). PCR was the most sensitive (91.66%) and specific (100%) technique when compared with other diagnostic techniques. Conclusion: In conclusion, PCR differentiated two species of Leishmania in Iraq, 60% Leishmania major and 40% Leishmania tropica and it was the most sensitive and specific diagnostic test in cutaneous leishmaniasis. I.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alheany et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: