Key result
Contrast-enhanced transthoracic echocardiography significantly improved the endocardial border definition score index compared to noncontrast imaging (1.23 vs 2.06; P<0.0001).
Why the study?
Does microsphere contrast-enhanced transthoracic echocardiography improve endocardial border definition in adult congenital heart disease patients compared to unenhanced imaging?
Observational (n=20)
No
Does microsphere contrast-enhanced transthoracic echocardiography improve endocardial border definition in adult congenital heart disease patients compared to unenhanced imaging?
Absolute Event Rate: 1.23% vs 2.06%
p-value: p=<.0001
Contrast-enhanced transthoracic echocardiography significantly improves right and left ventricular endocardial definition in adult congenital heart disease patients, particularly those with suboptimal baseline images.
May aid ventricular visualization in adult congenital heart disease; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective outcome trials before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) plays a key role in adult congenital heart disease (ACHD). However, a significant number of studies are nondiagnostic due to poor image quality. Enhancement of the blood pool-tissue interface with contrast-enhanced TTE (CE-TTE) can improve image quality in suboptimal studies. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate feasibility and clinical utility of CE-TTE in the assessment of patients with ACHD. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all CE-TTE performed in ACHD patients at our institution from August 2007 to May 2014 was performed. Endocardial definition scores (EDS) for each segment in the right and left ventricles were graded pre- and postcontrast imaging, as 1 = good, 2 = suboptimal, 3 = not seen. The endocardial border definition score index (EBDSI) was also calculated pre- and postcontrast imaging. RESULTS: Twenty patients with ACHD had 24 CE. Summation data for all ventricular EDS for unenhanced TTE vs. CE-TTE imaging was: EDS 1 = 136 vs. 314, EDS 2 = 119 vs. 72, EDS 3 = 162 vs. 31, respectively. Wilcoxon matched-pairs rank-signed test showed a significant ranking difference (improvement) pre- and postcontrast for the combined ventricular data (P < .0001) and the individual left and right ventricular data (all P < .0001). The EBDSI for combined ventricular data using CE-TTE was significantly lower than for noncontrast imaging (1.23 ± 0.49 vs. 2.06 ± 0.62, P < .0001). There was one minor contrast adverse reaction. CONCLUSIONS: CE-TTE resulted in significantly improved right and left ventricular endocardial definition and improved EDBSI. CE-TTE should be viewed as an additional imaging technique that is available to help assess patients with ACHD, especially those with nondiagnostic images.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Platts et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Adult congenital heart disease (n=20). Contrast-enhanced transthoracic echocardiography (CE-TTE) vs. Unenhanced transthoracic echocardiography was evaluated on Endocardial border definition score index (EBDSI) (p=<.0001). Contrast-enhanced transthoracic echocardiography significantly improved the endocardial border definition score index compared to noncontrast imaging (1.23 vs 2.06; P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: