Key result
The active compliance chamber with feedback control successfully reproduced physiological aortic pressure waveforms with low variability (σ = 0.19 mm Hg) compared to a deactivated chamber (σ = 2.4 mm Hg).
Why the study?
Passive compliance chambers in mock circulation loops can limit stress-based testing of arteries under physiological waveforms.
An active compliance chamber with feedback control accurately reproduces physiological and pathological arterial pressure waveforms in a mock circulation loop, providing an advanced tool for preclinical evaluation of vascular implants.
May advance preclinical vascular implant testing in mock loops; leaves open in vivo validation and clinical translation.
BACKGROUND: Arterial compliance assists the cardiovascular system with three key roles: (i) storing up to 50% of the stroke volume; (ii) ensuring blood flow during diastole; (iii) dampening pressure oscillations through arterial distension. In mock circulation loops (MCLs), arterial compliance was simulated either with membrane, spring, or Windkessel chambers. Although they have been shown to be suitable for cardiac device testing, their passive behavior can limit stress-based testing of arteries. Here we present an active compliance chamber with a feedback control of variable compliance as part of an MCL designed for biomechanical evaluation of arteries under physiological waveforms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The chamber encloses a piston that changes the volume via a cascaded controller when there is a difference between the real-time pressure and the physiological reference pressure with the aim to equilibrate both pressures. RESULTS: The experimental results showed repeatable physiological waveforms of aortic pressure in health (80-120 mm Hg), systemic hypertension (90-153 mm Hg), and heart failure reduced ejection fraction (78-108 mm Hg). Statistical validation (n = 20) of the function of the chamber is presented against compared raw data. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that the active compliance chamber can track the actual pressure of the MCL and balance it in real time (every millisecond) with the reference values in order to shape the given pressure waveform. The active compliance chamber is an advanced tool for MCL applications for biomechanical examination of stented arteries and for preclinical evaluation of vascular implants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Agrafiotis et al. (2021) studied this question. Active compliance chamber vs. Deactivated compliance chamber was evaluated on Pressure waveform matching (mean aortic pressure variability). The active compliance chamber with feedback control successfully reproduced physiological aortic pressure waveforms with low variability (σ = 0.19 mm Hg) compared to a deactivated chamber (σ = 2.4 mm Hg).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: