Why the study?
Does non-invasive blood pressure waveform measurement accurately estimate arterial compliance compared to invasive measurement?
Does non-invasive blood pressure waveform measurement accurately estimate arterial compliance compared to invasive measurement?
Non-invasive blood pressure waveforms can be utilized to estimate total arterial compliance, offering a potential alternative to invasive aortic measurements.
Arterial mechanics in CVD merit modeling; leaves open any impact on clinical risk stratification or therapy.
Most of the epidemiological studies have shown a good relationship between blood pressure and manifestation of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). CVD has become a very common health condition that exhibits significant changes in distensibilility, compliance, and elastic modulus of the arterial vascular system. The main causes of this disease are the spreading of fats and cholesterols which initiate the damaging of endothelium, decreasing wall buffering capacity, and hardening of the arteries eventually leading to severe narrowing. We compared data from invasive and non-invasive blood pressure wave form. Using the Windkessel model, to estimate the arterial compliance as vascular index, we used data after the aortic valve closed to the end-diastolic point of blood pressure waveforms, utilized Bland-Altman difference plot, T-test, box whisker plot and scatter diagram. We analyzed physiological real data and investigated the correlation between the non-invasive and invasive blood pressure wave form. Non-invasive compressive pulse waveforms can be used to assess the total compliance of the arterial blood pressure waveforms of the invasive aorta that indicates the buffering of muscle and adipose tissue.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: