Key result
Finapres noninvasive measurements produced similar time-averaged CrCP and RAP results to intra-arterial measurements using linear regression, but differed significantly using the first harmonic method (p<0.00003).
Why the study?
Does noninvasive arterial blood pressure measurement using Finapres accurately estimate cerebral critical closing pressure compared to intra-aortic measurements?
Observational (n=27)
Does noninvasive arterial blood pressure measurement using Finapres accurately estimate cerebral critical closing pressure compared to intra-aortic measurements?
p-value: p=<0.00003
The linear regression method using Finapres produces similar time-averaged results to intra-arterial measurements for estimating cerebral critical closing pressure, but the first harmonic method is preferred for beat-to-beat changes.
Finapres linear regression supports time-averaged CrCP estimates; leaves open first harmonic method accuracy for beat-to-beat use.
Estimates of cerebral critical closing pressure (CrCP) and resistance-area product (RAP) are often derived using noninvasive measurements of arterial blood pressure (ABP) in the finger, but the errors introduced by this approach, in relation to intra-vascular measurements of ABP, are not known. Continuous recordings of ABP (Finapres and solid-state catheter-tip transducer in the ascending aorta), cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV, bilateral Doppler), ECG and transcutaneous CO(2) were performed following coronary catheterization. CrCP and RAP were calculated for each of 12,784 cardiac cycles from 27 subjects using the classical linear regression (LR) of the instantaneous CBFV-ABP relationship and also the first harmonic (H(1)) of the Fourier transform. There was a better agreement between LR and H(1) for the aortic measurements than for the Finapres (p < 0.000,01). For LR there were no significant differences for either CrCP or RAP due to the source of ABP measurement, but for H(1) the differences were highly significant (p < 0.000,03). The coherence functions between either CrCP or RAP values calculated with aortic pressure (input) or the Finapres (output) were significantly higher for H(1) than for LR for most harmonics below 0.2 Hz. When using the Finapres to estimate CrCP and RAP values, the LR method produces similar results to intra-arterial measurements of ABP for time-averaged values, but H(1) should be preferred in applications analysing beat-to-beat changes in these parameters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Panerai et al. (2006) conducted an observational in Patients following coronary catheterization (n=27). Finapres noninvasive measurement of arterial blood pressure vs. Intra-vascular measurement of arterial blood pressure in the ascending aorta was evaluated on Differences in cerebral critical closing pressure (CrCP) or resistance-area product (RAP) due to the source of ABP measurement (p=<0.00003). Finapres noninvasive measurements produced similar time-averaged CrCP and RAP results to intra-arterial measurements using linear regression, but differed significantly using the first harmonic method (p<0.00003).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: