Key result
Elective EVAR was associated with 3- and 5-year survival rates of 73.9% and 53.9%, and a developed survival predictive model showed good discrimination capacity (C statistic 0.703; 95% CI 0.641-0.765).
Why the study?
What are the long-term survival rates and predictors of mortality after elective EVAR in a population with a low incidence of coronary artery disease?
Cohort (n=176)
No
What are the long-term survival rates and predictors of mortality after elective EVAR in a population with a low incidence of coronary artery disease?
Long-term survival after EVAR in a Southern European population was worse than expected and predominantly related to cancer, highlighting the need for region-specific predictive models.
Elective EVAR survival may be lower than expected in low-CAD populations; leaves open validation of region-specific predictive models.
BACKGROUND: Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is a prophylactic procedure, so the decision to operate should consider, as recent guidelines suggest, the life expectancy of the patient. Several models for predicting life span have been already designed, but little is known about how intervened patients evolve in Southern European Countries, where the incidence of coronary artery disease, the main cause of death among these subjects, is low. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 176 consecutive patients who underwent elective EVAR at the Vascular Surgery Department of the Hospital del Mar (Barcelona, Spain) during 2000-2014. Cox regressions were performed to identify preoperative factors associated with long-term survival after EVAR, and a risk model was developed. RESULTS: Three- and five-year survival rates were 73.9 and 53.9 %, respectively. During the follow-up, 72 deaths (40.9 %) were registered, cancer being the most frequent cause (41.7 %). Preoperative variables negatively associated with long-term survival were serum creatinine ≥ 150 µmol/L (HR 2.5; 95 % CI 1.4-4.2), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR 1.9; 95 % CI 1.2-3.1), atrial fibrillation (HR 2.0; 95 % CI 1.2-3.4), and prior cancer history (HR 1.9; 95 % CI 1.2-3.1). Distal pulses present in both lower limbs were marginally associated with survival (HR 0.65; 95 % CI 0.4-1.07). The survival predictive model showed a good discrimination capacity (C statistic = 0.703; 95 % CI 0.641-0.765). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term survival of patients submitted to EVAR in our setting was worse than expected and markedly related to cancer. Our study suggests that predictive models for long-term survival after EVAR may be influenced by regional characteristics of the intervened population. This effect should be taken in consideration in the decision-making process of these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sevilla et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (n=176). Elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) was evaluated on Long-term survival. Elective EVAR was associated with 3- and 5-year survival rates of 73.9% and 53.9%, and a developed survival predictive model showed good discrimination capacity (C statistic 0.703; 95% CI 0.641-0.765).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: