Key result
Males had a higher risk of metformin-associated (OR 1.07; 99% CI 1.00-1.14) and sulfonylurea-associated (OR 1.21; 99% CI 1.10-1.33) myocardial infarction than females.
Why the study?
Medical treatment should be tailored to individual characteristics, prompting investigation into whether spontaneous reporting system case-only analyses can detect host-medication interactions in oral antidiabetic drug-associated myocardial infarction.
Does male sex increase the risk of oral antidiabetic drug-associated myocardial infarction compared to female sex?
Case-Control (n=256,071)
Yes
Does male sex increase the risk of oral antidiabetic drug-associated myocardial infarction compared to female sex?
Odds Ratio: 1.07 (95% CI 1–1.14)
Male patients may have a higher risk of myocardial infarction associated with metformin and sulfonylureas compared to females, highlighting the importance of sex-specific considerations in diabetes treatment.
Background Medical treatment should be tailored to an individual's characteristics to optimize treatment benefits. We examined whether case-only analyses from spontaneous reporting systems can detect host-medication interactions in oral antidiabetic drug-associated myocardial infarction. Methods and Results Interaction between sex and use of oral antidiabetic drugs was mined among patients with myocardial infarction in the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System from 2004 to 2014, including 55 718 males and 42 428 females. The odds ratio ( OR ) of multiplicative interactions was used to estimate sex-drug interaction. Detected signs of these interactions were then validated by a nested case-control study utilizing a healthcare record database, Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database, from 2001 to 2014, including 31 585 cases and 126 340 controls. In the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System, a higher proportion of male than female patients used metformin (10.32% in males versus 7.82% in females) and sulfonylureas (4.75% in males versus 3.43% in females); after adjusting for patients' pharmacy-based chronic disease score, males had a higher risk of metformin-associated ( OR =1.07; 99% confidence interval, 1.00-1.14) and sulfonylureas-associated ( OR =1.21; 99% confidence interval, 1.10-1.33) myocardial infarction than females. Detected signs of sex-drug interactions were validated in the National Health Insurance Research Database ( OR for metformin=1.14; 99% confidence interval, 1.03-1.26; OR for sulfonylureas=1.13; 99% confidence interval, 1.02-1.25). Conclusions Males have a higher risk of metformin- and sulfonylureas-associated myocardial infarction than females, which suggests that sex-drug interactions are a key issue in diabetes mellitus treatment plan development. This case-only approach using information from spontaneous reporting systems may be a potential tool for screening host-medication interactions that cause adverse events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2018) conducted a case-control in Myocardial infarction (n=256,071). Male sex (in patients using metformin or sulfonylureas) vs. Female sex was evaluated on Metformin-associated myocardial infarction (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.00-1.14). Males had a higher risk of metformin-associated (OR 1.07; 99% CI 1.00-1.14) and sulfonylurea-associated (OR 1.21; 99% CI 1.10-1.33) myocardial infarction than females.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: