Key result
Combined open and endovascular treatment for complex aortic disease in 4 patients resulted in 2 deaths and 1 case of paraplegia, with 2 patients surviving at 13 and 34 months.
Why the study?
Does combined open and endovascular treatment provide a viable option for patients with complex aortic disease?
Observational (n=4)
Does combined open and endovascular treatment provide a viable option for patients with complex aortic disease?
Combined open and endovascular treatment may be an option for high-risk patients with complex aortic disease, though it carries significant risks of mortality and severe complications such as paraplegia.
The purpose of this article is to report whether combined open and endovascular treatment could be applied in patients with complex aortic disease. A retrospective study including four patients with complex aortic disease was undertaken. In all patients, extra-anatomic bypass to the visceral arteries was made through a laparotomy while the aortic lesion was repaired by stent grafting. One patient died on the first postoperative day and another died 3 months after treatment from a myocardial infarction. The other two patients were alive 13 and 34 months after treatment, respectively. However, a patient treated for a ruptured thoracoabdominal type 2 aneurysm on the basis of a dissection suffers from postoperative paraplegia. The combination of open surgery with extra-anatomic bypass to visceral arteries and stent grafting could be an option for the treatment of patients with complex aortic disease, especially in high-risk cases in which more extensive open surgery is contraindicated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lundbom et al. (2004) conducted an observational in complex aortic disease (n=4). Combined open and endovascular treatment was evaluated. Combined open and endovascular treatment for complex aortic disease in 4 patients resulted in 2 deaths and 1 case of paraplegia, with 2 patients surviving at 13 and 34 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: