Key result
Macitentan fails to reduce disease progression over standard of care in pediatric PAH.
Why the study?
To evaluate the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of macitentan versus standard of care in pediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Does macitentan improve clinical outcomes and quality of life compared to standard of care in pediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension?
RCT
Does macitentan improve clinical outcomes and quality of life compared to standard of care in pediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension?
Hazard Ratio: 0.828 (95% CI 0.46–1.492)
p-value: p=>.05
In pediatric PAH, macitentan achieved adequate dosing pharmacokinetics and improved quality of life compared to standard of care, though it did not significantly reduce disease progression.
Supports macitentan dosing in pediatric PAH; extends adult pharmacokinetic data to children.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate pharmacokinetics (PK), efficacy, and safety of macitentan vs standard of care (SoC) in pediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). STUDY DESIGN: plasma concentration of macitentan and aprocitentan (active metabolite) at week 12. Secondary endpoints included time-to-first clinical event committee-confirmed disease progression, safety/tolerability, change in NT-proBNP, and quality of life. RESULTS: concentrations were 185 (114.3) and 983 (324.1) ng/mL. Mean treatment duration was 183.36 weeks (macitentan) and 130.59 weeks (SoC). Hazard ratios (95% CI) for time-to-event analyses (macitentan vs SoC) were 0.828 (0.460-1.492) for disease progression, 0.912 (0.393-2.118) for PAH hospitalization, and 1.530 (0.429-5.457) for PAH mortality (P > .05 for all). Percentage of baseline NT-proBNP was 72% (macitentan) vs 101% (SoC) at week 12 (P = .086) and 76% vs 78% at week 24 (P = .884). Macitentan showed clinically meaningful improvements in quality of life assessments vs SoC for children (P = .043) and parents (P = .020) at week 24. The safety profile of macitentan was consistent with that seen in adults. CONCLUSIONS: TOMORROW was a novel study assessing PK and the long-term efficacy and safety of macitentan vs SoC in pediatric PAH. The results confirm the adequacy of the macitentan dosing in this population and provided signals of potential benefit of macitentan over SoC for children with PAH. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (ID number, NCT02932410; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02932410).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Berger et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in pediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Macitentan vs. Standard of care (SoC) was evaluated on time-to-first clinical event committee-confirmed disease progression (HR 0.828, 95% CI 0.460-1.492, p=>.05). In children with pulmonary arterial hypertension, macitentan did not significantly reduce the risk of disease progression compared to standard of care (HR 0.828; 95% CI 0.460-1.492; P>0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: