Why the study?
Does oral isosorbide-5-mononitrate compared to isosorbide dinitrate improve or prolong hemodynamic effects in patients with ischemic heart failure?
Does oral isosorbide-5-mononitrate compared to isosorbide dinitrate improve or prolong hemodynamic effects in patients with ischemic heart failure?
Oral ISMN and ISDN are equipotent in reducing filling pressure in ischemic heart failure, but ISMN maintains its hemodynamic effects for a longer duration.
ISMN may be preferred for sustained preload reduction in ischemic HF; extends nitrate duration data for clinical selection and trial design.
Isosorbide-5-mononitrate (ISMN), the main metabolite of isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN) was recently introduced in clinical use. The hemodynamic effects of oral ISMN and ISDN, administered in equal doses, were studied in a randomized, crossover fashion in 20 patients with pump failure of ischemic etiology. Baseline hemodynamic criteria for admission into the study were: pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCW) of at least 20 mmHg and systolic arterial pressure (AP) above 90 mmHg. Hemodynamic parameters were serially measured and systemic vascular resistance was calculated up to 6 h postadministration of either ISMN or ISDN single dose (40 mg). Maximal effects obtained were statistically significantly different from baseline. While ISMN and ISDN appeared to be equipotent in reducing the filling pressure, with a maximum effect reached in 60-120 min, the mononitrate maintained its effects for a longer period.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rabinowitz et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: