Key result
Oral isosorbide mononitrate fails to reduce 6-month mortality versus placebo in suspected acute MI.
Why the study?
The effects of oral isosorbide 5-mononitrate on mortality following acute myocardial infarction, stratified by presence of left ventricular failure, were uncertain.
Does oral isosorbide 5-mononitrate reduce mortality in patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction?
RCT (n=360)
Double-blind
randomized
Yes
Does oral isosorbide 5-mononitrate reduce mortality in patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction?
Absolute Event Rate: 14.1% vs 10.5%
p-value: p=NS
Oral isosorbide 5-mononitrate does not significantly reduce overall mortality in suspected acute myocardial infarction and may increase mortality in patients without heart failure, questioning its routine use in this subgroup.
Does not support routine use of oral isosorbide 5-mononitrate in suspected acute MI; confirms lack of 6-month mortality benefit.
We have conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre trial of oral isosorbide 5-mononitrate (ISMN) in 360 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. Patients were stratified prior to analysis according to the presence or absence of left ventricular failure on admission. ISMN caused a significant reduction in systolic and diastolic blood pressure during the first 12 h. There was no significant effect on heart rate. Overall mortality was 4.9% in the ISMN group compared with 4.0% in controls at 5 days, and 14.1% compared with 10.5% at 6 months (NS). A non-significant reduction in mortality in the ISMN group with heart failure (ISMN 7.9%, placebo 12.9%, at 5 days) contrasted with a non-significant increase in mortality in patients without heart failure treated with ISMN (ISMN 4.1%, placebo 2.1%, at 5 days). Lignocaine was used in twice as many patients in the ISMN group as in placebo group (P less than 0.01), both with and without heart failure. Diamorphine usage was similar in the ISMN and control groups. Oral ISMN has similar haemodynamic effects to intravenous nitroglycerin, and can be of benefit in acute myocardial infarction with heart failure. However, our results question the use of nitrates in acute myocardial infarction in the absence of heart failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fitzgerald et al. (1990) conducted an RCT in suspected acute myocardial infarction (n=360). oral isosorbide 5-mononitrate vs. placebo was evaluated on Overall mortality at 6 months (p=NS). Oral isosorbide 5-mononitrate did not significantly reduce overall mortality at 6 months compared to placebo in patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction (14.1% vs 10.5%, NS).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: