Key result
Isosorbide-5-mononitrate was poorly tolerated, with 45% of microvascular angina patients dropping out due to side effects, and had no significant effect on coronary blood flow (p=0.55).
Why the study?
Does isosorbide-5-mononitrate improve clinical status and quality of life in patients with microvascular angina?
RCT (n=20)
Does isosorbide-5-mononitrate improve clinical status and quality of life in patients with microvascular angina?
Isosorbide-5-mononitrate is poorly tolerated in patients with microvascular angina, and provides only modest symptomatic benefit without improving coronary microvascular function in those who can tolerate it.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Isosorbide-5-mononitrate should not be used in microvascular angina due to poor tolerability and absent flow benefit; challenges its role and supports alternative therapies in future trials.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of isosorbide-5-mononitrate (ISMN) in patients with microvascular angina (MVA). METHODS: We randomized 20 MVA patients, treated with a β-blocker or a calcium antagonist, to 60 mg slow-release ISMN (halved to 30 mg if not tolerated) or placebo once a day for 4 weeks; the patients were then switched to the other treatment for another 4 weeks. Their clinical status was assessed with the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) and the EuroQoL score for quality of life. The exercise stress test (EST), coronary blood flow (CBF) response to nitrate and the cold pressor test (CPT), brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and nitrate-mediated dilation (NMD) were also assessed. RESULTS: Nine patients (45%) did not complete the ISMN phase due to side effects; 2 patients refused a follow-up. Nine patients completed the study. The SAQ and EuroQoL scores were significantly better with ISMN than with placebo, although the differences were small. No differences were found between the treatments in the EST results, CBF response to nitroglycerin (p = 0.55) and the CPT (p = 0.54), FMD (p = 0.26) and NMD (p = 0.35). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, a high proportion of MVA patients showed an intolerance to ISMN; in those tolerating the drug, significant effects on their angina status were observed, but the benefit appeared to be modest and independent of effects on coronary microvascular function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2015) conducted an RCT in Microvascular angina (n=20). Isosorbide-5-mononitrate (ISMN) vs. Placebo was evaluated on Clinical status (Seattle Angina Questionnaire and EuroQoL score) and coronary microvascular function. Isosorbide-5-mononitrate was poorly tolerated, with 45% of microvascular angina patients dropping out due to side effects, and had no significant effect on coronary blood flow (p=0.55).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: