Why the study?
The study was conducted to determine the diagnostic capabilities of left ventricular global longitudinal systolic strain during treadmill stress echocardiography for diagnosing the functional significance of coronary stenosis.
Does left ventricular global longitudinal systolic strain during treadmill stress echocardiography accurately diagnose the functional significance of coronary stenosis in patients with ischemic heart disease?
Observational (n=121)
Does left ventricular global longitudinal systolic strain during treadmill stress echocardiography accurately diagnose the functional significance of coronary stenosis in patients with ischemic heart disease?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Postexercise left ventricular global longitudinal systolic strain <16.9% during treadmill stress echocardiography can identify pronounced coronary artery stenosis with 80% sensitivity and 70% specificity.
Aim To determine diagnostic capabilities of left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal systolic strain (GLSS) in stress echocardiography (stress-EchoCG) with a treadmill test for diagnosing the functional significance of the degree of coronary stenosis.Material and methods The study included 121 patients (73 men aged 68.3±7.7 years) with suspected or previously diagnosed ischemic heart disease (IHD). Speckle-tracking stress-EchCG (method of tracking speckles on two-dimensional gray-scale ultrasonic images) with a treadmill test and coronarography was performed for all patients. The patients were divided into 3 groups based on the severity of coronary artery (CA) stenosis according to the Gensini scale.Results LV GLSS at rest did not significantly differ between the study groups. After the exercise, LV GLSS was significantly lower in patients with pronounced CA stenosis than in patients without or with moderate CA stenosis (15.9±4.6 % vs. 20.6±3.7 % (p<0.001) and 19.6±3.0 % (p=0.003), respectively). Postexercise LV GLSS <16.9% suggested a pronounced CA stenosis with a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 70% (area under the curve, AUC, 0.76±0.06 at 95 % confidence interval, CI, 0.63-0.89; р<0.001). In the patient group without CA stenosis, LV GLSS showed a significant increase after completion of the exercise (from 19.1±3.1 to 20.6±3.7; p=0.04).Conclusion Evaluation of LV GLSS and its dynamics in stress-EchoCG with a treadmill test may be promising in patients with IHD, since in most patients with pronounced CA stenosis, LV GLSS is reduced at baseline and further reduces in response to exercise. In patients without CA stenosis, LV GLSS increases after completing the exercise.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stepanova et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Ischemic heart disease (n=121). Speckle-tracking stress-echocardiography with a treadmill test vs. Patients without or with moderate coronary artery stenosis was evaluated on Diagnosis of pronounced coronary artery stenosis (AUC 0.76, 95% CI 0.63-0.89, p=<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: