Key result
Heparin (50-100 units/kg load) and thrombolytics like urokinase are used to treat neonatal thrombosis, though well-designed studies are lacking.
In the absence of well-designed trials, the management of neonatal thrombosis relies on anecdotal dosing strategies for heparin and thrombolytics, utilizing activated clotting times for monitoring.
Neonatal thrombosis care relies on anecdotal dosing; leaves open the need for prospective trials to guide therapy.
Thrombotic events are a serious and potentially fatal complication during the neonatal period. Despite clinically serious thromboses in up to one percent of neonates and less severe complications (e.g., catheter malfunction secondary to clots) in a much higher percentage, well-designed studies on prevention and treatment of thromboses are lacking. Treatment approaches are largely anecdotal and involve the use of heparin and, occasionally, thrombolytics. Proper monitoring of anticoagulant and thrombolytic effects is difficult because of the limited blood volumes available from neonates and the relatively large sample volumes needed for most coagulation studies. Activated clotting times (ACTs) are preferred because they use low blood volume and are a rapid bedside test. Heparin should be administered with an initial loading dose of 50-100 units/kg followed by a continuous infusion of 20 units/kg/h. Further doses should then be adjusted based on the ACT, targeting a value of 1.5-2.5 times the control. Thrombolytics also have been used in several case reports and are guided by both clinical response and serial D-dimer values. We prefer urokinase 100 units/kg/h for local infusion to the thrombus and urokinase 1000-10,000 units/kg/h for systemic therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 1991 study conducted a review in Neonatal Thrombosis. Heparin and Thrombolytics was evaluated. Heparin (50-100 units/kg load) and thrombolytics like urokinase are used to treat neonatal thrombosis, though well-designed studies are lacking.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: