Key result
Endovascular treatment of isolated chronic abdominal aortic dissection in three elderly patients resulted in no perioperative mortality or early reinterventions, with one late reintervention at 8 years.
Case Report (n=3)
No
Endovascular treatment appears to be a feasible and durable option for isolated chronic abdominal aortic dissection with aneurysmal degeneration, though long-term follow-up is required.
Endovascular repair may be feasible in isolated chronic abdominal aortic dissection; leaves open optimal management and long-term outcomes.
Isolated acute abdominal aortic dissection is a relatively rare event. Its natural history is not fully understood and its optimal treatment is not established. Open surgery represents the most described treatment but endovascular intervention has had increasing application. Isolated chronic abdominal aortic dissection is even less described in the literature. We describe three patients with isolated chronic abdominal aortic dissection who underwent endovascular treatment in our institution. Mean age at presentation was 82 years. Indication for surgical intervention was aneurismal degeneration. Mean aortic diameter at presentation was 46.7 mm. There was no perioperative mortality or reinterventions. Mean follow-up was 5.3 years (2-12 years). Late reintervention was needed in one patient, eight years after initial surgery, due to type 1 endoleak. According to our experience, endovascular intervention represents an effective and durable treatment option in isolated chronic abdominal aortic dissection. However, long-term follow-up is mandatory. Furthermore, larger studies are still needed to understand this disease and its adequate treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Machado et al. (2016) conducted a case report in Isolated chronic abdominal aortic dissection (n=3). Endovascular treatment was evaluated on Perioperative mortality or reinterventions. Endovascular treatment of isolated chronic abdominal aortic dissection in three elderly patients resulted in no perioperative mortality or early reinterventions, with one late reintervention at 8 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: