Key result
In vitro derived cardiomyocytes share conserved regulatory networks with in vivo cardiomyocytes during early development, but significantly diverge in late stages regarding apoptosis and cell cycle.
Why the study?
Current computational approaches do not adequately account for how interacting regulators, including noncoding RNAs, control cardiac gene expression dynamics over time.
An integrated modeling framework (CGRM) demonstrates that in vitro hPSC-derived cardiomyocytes share early regulatory networks with in vivo cells but diverge significantly in late stages.
Urges caution extrapolating late-stage in vitro cardiomyocyte models to therapy; leaves open protocol refinements to match in vivo maturation.
AIMS: Dissecting complex interactions among transcription factors (TFs), microRNAs (miRNAs) and long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are central for understanding heart development and function. Although computational approaches and platforms have been described to infer relationships among regulatory factors and genes, current approaches do not adequately account for how highly diverse, interacting regulators that include noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) control cardiac gene expression dynamics over time. METHODS: To overcome this limitation, we devised an integrated framework, cardiac gene regulatory modeling (CGRM) that integrates LogicTRN and regulatory component analysis bioinformatics modeling platforms to infer complex regulatory mechanisms. We then used CGRM to identify and compare the TF-ncRNA gene regulatory networks that govern early- and late-stage cardiomyocytes (CMs) generated by in vitro differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells (hPSC) and ventricular and atrial CMs isolated during in vivo human cardiac development. RESULTS: Comparisons of in vitro versus in vivo derived CMs revealed conserved regulatory networks among TFs and ncRNAs in early cells that significantly diverged in late staged cells. We report that cardiac genes ("heart targets") expressed in early-stage hPSC-CMs are primarily regulated by MESP1, miR-1, miR-23, lncRNAs NEAT1 and MALAT1, while GATA6, HAND2, miR-200c, NEAT1 and MALAT1 are critical for late hPSC-CMs. The inferred TF-miRNA-lncRNA networks regulating heart development and contraction were similar among early-stage CMs, among individual hPSC-CM datasets and between in vitro and in vivo samples. However, genes related to apoptosis, cell cycle and proliferation, and transmembrane transport showed a high degree of divergence between in vitro and in vivo derived late-stage CMs. Overall, late-, but not early-stage CMs diverged greatly in the expression of "heart target" transcripts and their regulatory mechanisms. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, we find that hPSC-CMs are regulated in a cell autonomous manner during early development that diverges significantly as a function of time when compared to in vivo derived CMs. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of using CGRM to reveal dynamic and complex transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulatory interactions that underlie cell directed versus environment-dependent CM development. These results with in vitro versus in vivo derived CMs thus establish this approach for detailed analyses of heart disease and for the analysis of cell regulatory systems in other biomedical fields.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2023) studied Cardiac development. In vitro vs in vivo cardiomyocyte development was evaluated on Identification of TF-ncRNA gene regulatory networks governing early- and late-stage cardiomyocytes. In vitro derived cardiomyocytes share conserved regulatory networks with in vivo cardiomyocytes during early development, but significantly diverge in late stages regarding apoptosis and cell cycle.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: