Key result
Low-voltage shock impedance measurements failed to detect insulation breaches in 6 cases, resulting in life-threatening electrical short circuits, aborted shocks, or ICD generator damage.
Why the study?
Previous case reports suggest that low-voltage shock impedance measurements used to monitor ICD lead integrity may fail to detect insulation breaches causing life-threatening electrical short circuits.
Does low-voltage shock impedance measurement prevent undetected insulation breaches in patients with transvenous defibrillation leads?
Case Report (n=6)
Does low-voltage shock impedance measurement prevent undetected insulation breaches in patients with transvenous defibrillation leads?
Low-voltage shock impedance measurements can fail to detect life-threatening insulation breaches in ICD leads, suggesting that traditional defibrillator threshold testing or high-voltage synchronized shocks should be considered during device replacement.
Standard impedance testing may miss insulation breaches; case series leaves open need for better lead integrity monitoring.
BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators use low-voltage shock impedance measurements to monitor the lead integrity. However, previous case reports suggest that low-voltage shock impedance measurements may fail to detect insulation breaches that can cause life-threatening electrical short circuits. METHODS AND RESULTS: We report six cases of insulation breaches in transvenous defibrillation leads that were not obvious during standard interrogations and testing of the lead beforehand. In two cases, an electrical short circuit during commanded shock delivery for internal electrical cardioversion resulted in a total damage of the ICD generator. In one of these cases, commanded shock delivery induced ventricular fibrillation, which required external defibrillation. In two cases, a shock due to ventricular tachycardia was aborted as the shock impedance was less than 20 Ω. However, in both cases the tiny residual shock energy terminated the ventricular tachycardia. In contrast, in one case the residual energy of the aborted shock did not end ventricular fibrillation induced at defibrillator threshold testing. In one case, the ICD indicated an error code for a short circuit condition detected during an adequate shock delivery. CONCLUSIONS: This case series illustrates that low-voltage shock impedance measurements can fail to detect insulation breaches. These data suggest that in patients without a contraindication, traditional defibrillator threshold testing or high voltage synchronized shock at the time of device replacement should be considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parwani et al. (2020) conducted a case report in Implantable cardioverter defibrillators with transvenous defibrillation leads (n=6). Low-voltage shock impedance measurements was evaluated on Detection of insulation breaches. Low-voltage shock impedance measurements failed to detect insulation breaches in 6 cases, resulting in life-threatening electrical short circuits, aborted shocks, or ICD generator damage.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: