Key result
Platelet count demonstrated a nonlinear relationship with cognitive function in patients with atrial fibrillation, with an inflection point at 230.
Why the study?
Patients with atrial fibrillation have an increased risk of cognitive impairment, but evidence on the relationship between platelet count and cognitive function in this population is lacking.
Is there a correlation between serum platelet count and cognitive function in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Cross-Sectional (n=254)
No
Is there a correlation between serum platelet count and cognitive function in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Hazard Ratio: 0 (95% CI -0.01–0.01)
There is a nonlinear relationship between platelet count and cognitive function in patients with atrial fibrillation, suggesting an optimal platelet count around 230.
May link platelet count to cognition in AF; leaves open causal role or clinical utility pending prospective data.
Background. The risk of cognitive impairment in patients with atrial fibrillation is significantly increased. Its occurrence may be related to blood hypercoagulable state and immune inflammatory reaction. Platelets can mediate immune inflammatory response, but there is no evidence about the relationship between platelet count and cognitive function in patients with atrial fibrillation. Purpose. To explore whether there is a certain correlation between platelet count and cognitive function in patients with atrial fibrillation. Methods. A cross-sectional study was conducted in a single center in China, including 254 patients with atrial fibrillation. Cognitive function assessment and clinical and laboratory examinations were performed on all participants. After adjusting the related confounding factors, the relationship between platelet count and cognitive function was analyzed. Results. A total of 254 subjects with an average age of 59.71 ± 11.14 years were included. The average platelet count was 208.15 ± 68.30, and the average score of cognitive function was 19.29 ± 6.78. Result of fully adjusted binary logistic regression showed platelet count was negatively associated with the cognitive function score after adjusting confounders (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.000, 95%CI −0.01, 0.01). A nonlinear relationship was detected between platelet count and the cognitive function score, whose point was 230. The effect sizes and the confidence intervals of the left and right sides of the inflection point were 0.03 (0.01–0.05, P for nonlinearity = 0.011) and −0.03 (−0.05–0.00, P for nonlinearity = 0.023), respectively. Conclusion. Platelets have a nonlinear relationship with cognitive function in patients with atrial fibrillation. This finding suggests that, in patients with atrial fibrillation, platelets should be maintained at about 230.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in atrial fibrillation (n=254). Platelet count was evaluated on cognitive function score (HR 0.000, 95% CI -0.01, 0.01). Platelet count demonstrated a nonlinear relationship with cognitive function in patients with atrial fibrillation, with an inflection point at 230.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: