Key result
Indexed peak VO2 and VE/VCO2 slope improve prediction of severe pulmonary hypertension in heart failure.
Why the study?
RHC is the invasive gold standard for diagnosing PH in left-sided heart disease, and noninvasive CPET could potentially help select HF patients who require RHC.
Does cardiopulmonary exercise testing predict the presence and severity of pulmonary hypertension in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction?
Cross-Sectional (n=428)
No
Does cardiopulmonary exercise testing predict the presence and severity of pulmonary hypertension in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction?
Odds Ratio: 1.046 (95% CI 1.015–1.078)
p-value: p=0.003
While standard CPET parameters do not differentiate between the presence or absence of mild pulmonary hypertension in HFrEF, they significantly improve the prediction of severe pulmonary hypertension phenotypes (PVR > 3 WU).
May enhance noninvasive prediction of severe PH in HFrEF; leaves open whether CPET can reduce RHC referrals.
Introduction: Left-sided heart disease is the leading cause of pulmonary hypertension (PH). Right heart catheterization (RHC) is the gold standard for diagnosing PH, although it is invasive. Noninvasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) could potentially help select heart failure (HF) patients who require RHC. Objectives: The study aimed to assess whether CPET could predict PH in patients with HF. Patients and methods: In this prospective cohort study, we analyzed data from 428 HF patients with a median age of 55 years and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (≤40%) who underwent both RHC and CPET. Patients with acute clinical instability or precapillary PH were excluded. Results: The median LVEF was 20%, and 66.8% of patients were in NYHA class III or IV. PH was diagnosed by RHC in 76.9% of patients. Breathing reserve was lower and peak respiratory exchange ratio was higher in patients with PH. Patients with pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) > 3 WU and mean pulmonary artery pressure >40 mmHg had lower indexed peak oxygen uptake and higher VE/VCO2. Indexed peak oxygen uptake improved the prediction of PH with PVR > 3 WU when added to the model composed of clinical and laboratory parameters. Conclusions: No differences were observed in indexed peak oxygen uptake or VE/VCO₂ slope between patients with and without PH. However, CPET results allowed more accurate prediction of more severe PH phenotypes. Patients with PH had lower ejection fraction and worse NYHA functional class and were more likely to be male and to have chronic kidney disease and diabetes. Overall, CPET parameters correlated with RHC findings and may help identify HF patients with PH, especially with high pulmonary vascular resistance. However, CPET cannot replace invasive hemodynamic assessment by RHC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sawczak et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=428). Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) parameters vs. Right heart catheterization (RHC) findings was evaluated on Prediction of pulmonary hypertension with pulmonary vascular resistance > 3 Wood units using VE/VCO2 slope (OR 1.046, 95% CI 1.015-1.078, p=0.003). While standard cardiopulmonary exercise testing parameters did not differ between heart failure patients with and without pulmonary hypertension, indexed peak oxygen uptake and VE/VCO2 slope significantly improved the prediction of severe pulmonary hypertension (PVR > 3 WU).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: