Key result
Dabigatran demonstrated a better bone safety profile than warfarin, which significantly decreased bone volume and increased trabecular separation and bone turnover in rats.
Why the study?
Does dabigatran have a better bone safety profile compared to warfarin in rats with normal renal function?
Does dabigatran have a better bone safety profile compared to warfarin in rats with normal renal function?
p-value: p=<0.05
In a rat model, dabigatran demonstrated a better bone safety profile than warfarin, which caused decreased bone volume and increased turnover.
Hypothesis-generating in rats; leaves open whether dabigatran offers bone safety advantages over warfarin in patients.
BACKGROUND: Warfarin, a widely used anticoagulant, is a vitamin K antagonist impairing the activity of vitamin K-dependent Bone Gla Protein (BGP or Osteocalcin) and Matrix Gla Protein (MGP). Because dabigatran, a new anticoagulant, has no effect on vitamin K metabolism, the aim of this study was to compare the impact of warfarin and dabigatran administration on bone structure and vascular calcification. METHODS: Rats with normal renal function received for 6 weeks warfarin, dabigatran or placebo. Bone was evaluated immuno-histochemically and hystomorphometrically after double labelling with declomycin and calcein. Aorta and iliac arteries were examined histologically. RESULTS: Histomorphometric analysis of femur and vertebrae showed significantly decreased bone volume and increased trabecular separation in rats treated with warfarin. Vertebra analysis showed that the trabecular number was higher in dabigatran treated rats. Osteoblast activity and resorption parameters were similar among groups, except for maximum erosion depth, which was higher in warfarin treated rats, suggesting a higher osteoclastic activity. Therefore, warfarin treatment was also associated with higher bone formation rate/bone surface and activation frequency. Warfarin treatment may cause an increased bone turnover characterized by increased remodelling cycles, with stronger osteoclast activity compared to the other groups. There were no differences among experimental groups in calcium deposition either in aortic or iliac arteries. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest for the first time that dabigatran has a better bone safety profile than warfarin, as warfarin treatment affects bone by reducing trabecular size and structure, increasing turnover and reducing mineralization. These differences could potentially result in a lower incidence of fractures in dabigatran treated patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fusaro et al. (2015) studied Normal renal function (n=34). Dabigatran vs. Warfarin and Placebo was evaluated on Bone volume and structure (histomorphometric analysis) (p=<0.05). Dabigatran demonstrated a better bone safety profile than warfarin, which significantly decreased bone volume and increased trabecular separation and bone turnover in rats.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: