Key result
Lyophilized rRT-PCR and RT-LAMP assays reliably detected foot-and-mouth disease virus in clinical samples from acutely infected and convalescent cattle in East African field settings.
Why the study?
Do lyophilized molecular assays (rRT-PCR and RT-LAMP) reliably detect foot-and-mouth disease virus in clinical samples from cattle in field settings?
Do lyophilized molecular assays (rRT-PCR and RT-LAMP) reliably detect foot-and-mouth disease virus in clinical samples from cattle in field settings?
Lyophilized molecular assays provide a reliable, simple, and rapid method for detecting foot-and-mouth disease virus directly in field settings.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Field-deployable molecular tests may accelerate FMD outbreak response; leaves open prospective accuracy validation against reference labs.
Accurate, timely diagnosis is essential for the control, monitoring and eradication of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD). Clinical samples from suspect cases are normally tested at reference laboratories. However, transport of samples to these centralized facilities can be a lengthy process that can impose delays on critical decision making. These concerns have motivated work to evaluate simple-to-use technologies, including molecular-based diagnostic platforms, that can be deployed closer to suspect cases of FMD. In this context, FMD virus (FMDV)-specific reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) and real-time RT-PCR (rRT-PCR) assays, compatible with simple sample preparation methods and in situ visualization, have been developed which share equivalent analytical sensitivity with laboratory-based rRT-PCR. However, the lack of robust 'ready-to-use kits' that utilize stabilized reagents limits the deployment of these tests into field settings. To address this gap, this study describes the performance of lyophilized rRT-PCR and RT-LAMP assays to detect FMDV. Both of these assays are compatible with the use of fluorescence to monitor amplification in real-time, and for the RT-LAMP assays end point detection could also be achieved using molecular lateral flow devices. Lyophilization of reagents did not adversely affect the performance of the assays. Importantly, when these assays were deployed into challenging laboratory and field settings within East Africa they proved to be reliable in their ability to detect FMDV in a range of clinical samples from acutely infected as well as convalescent cattle. These data support the use of highly sensitive molecular assays into field settings for simple and rapid detection of FMDV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Howson et al. (2015) studied Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD). Lyophilized rRT-PCR and RT-LAMP assays vs. Laboratory-based rRT-PCR was evaluated on Detection of FMDV. Lyophilized rRT-PCR and RT-LAMP assays reliably detected foot-and-mouth disease virus in clinical samples from acutely infected and convalescent cattle in East African field settings.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: