Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective To objectively quantify visuospatial selective and divided attention using steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) in adults with persistent visual symptoms after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Methods Eighteen adults with mTBI (40–350 days post-mTBI) and 27 healthy controls participated. Frequency-tagged SSVEPs to eccentric flickering stimuli along with concurrent behavioral yes/no contrast-decrement-detection task were recorded under three cued covert spatial attention conditions: Selective Attention (SelAtt), Divided Attention (DivAtt), and Ignore. EEG epochs associated with eye fixation loss were excluded using two independent procedures: automated EEG artifact-rejection algorithms and concurrent EyeLink eye-tracking data. Results The mTBI group showed no significant change in task accuracy and complex-value SSVEP responses across attentional conditions (P > 0.05). In contrast, controls showed significant improvements in task accuracy (P < 0.001) and significant SSVEP modulations across conditions (P = 0.03), with stronger SSVEP during SelAtt compared with Ignore (P = 0.008). SelAtt SSVEPs in mTBI were significantly weaker than controls (P = 0.04). Unlike mTBI, control SSVEP amplitude and inter-trial phase coherence (ITPC) significantly increased across conditions (P = 0.02 and < 0.001, respectively). Both groups did not show any significant modulation in SSVEP phase across attentional conditions (P > 0.05). The significant ITPC-amplitude correlation within each group (P < 0.001) was associated with attention status, whereby SelAtt was associated with higher neural ITPC-amplitude response. Conclusions These findings indicate impaired visuospatial selective attention in adults with persistent post-mTBI visual symptoms. Our results support neural synchronization theory on population-level neural correlates of attention and suggest impaired synchronization may underlie attention deficits in mTBI. Significance SSVEP provides objective neurophysiological indices of attentional processing in mTBI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Norouzpour et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: