Key result
Nonpulsatile flow compared to pulsatile flow during cardiopulmonary bypass showed no significant difference in gut motility suppression, which disappeared at 60 min when temperature reached 32°C.
Why the study?
Does pulsatile flow compared to nonpulsatile flow during cardiopulmonary bypass affect gastrointestinal motility in a porcine model?
Does pulsatile flow compared to nonpulsatile flow during cardiopulmonary bypass affect gastrointestinal motility in a porcine model?
Gastrointestinal motility is suppressed during hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass regardless of pulsatile or nonpulsatile flow, likely due to reduced body temperature.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Gut motility suppression during hypothermic CPB is independent of pulsatility in this porcine model; leaves open relevance to human outcomes.
Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is known to impair the integrity of the gastrointestinal tract. However, little is known about the movement behavior of the gastrointestinal tract during CPB. This study was aimed to assess the gastrointestinal motility with sonomicrometry, a distance measurement using ultrasound, in a porcine model of CPB. Twelve pigs weighing 70-112 kg were having a standard hypothermic CPB for 120 min either with the nonpulsatile flow (n = 6) or the pulsatile flow (n = 6). Before CPB, piezoelectric echo crystals were placed either along the longitudinal or the circular axis of the pylorus. Patterns of gut movement and the total sonomicrometric activity (TSA) were recorded at several time intervals during experiments as qualitative and quantitative parameters of gut motility. Results showed that the intact regular rhythmic pattern of gut movement was detected before CPB. This pattern changed little when CPB started, but it disappeared at 60 min when the body temperature lowered down to 32 degrees Celsius. During the same period, the TSA reduced significantly along the longitudinal as well as the circular directions of the pylorus. There was no significant difference between the nonpulsatile and pulsatile groups. Gut blood flow reduced significantly in both groups, but it was not associated with the reduced sonomicrometric activity. In conclusion, gastrointestinal motility during CPB can be measured qualitatively and quantitatively by sonomicrometry in a large animal model. Suppression of gut motility during CPB does not seem to be associated with the mode of perfusion but with the reduced body temperature during the hypothermic phase of CPB.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gu et al. (2006) studied Cardiopulmonary bypass (n=12). Nonpulsatile flow vs. Pulsatile flow was evaluated on Total sonomicrometric activity (TSA) and patterns of gut movement. Nonpulsatile flow compared to pulsatile flow during cardiopulmonary bypass showed no significant difference in gut motility suppression, which disappeared at 60 min when temperature reached 32°C.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: