Key result
Changes in thoracic fluid content measured by bioreactance correlated strongly with fluid removal and weight change during hemodialysis.
Why the study?
Does bioreactance-derived thoracic fluid content correlate with traditional indices of fluid removal during hemodialysis?
Observational (n=25)
No
Does bioreactance-derived thoracic fluid content correlate with traditional indices of fluid removal during hemodialysis?
Bioreactance-derived thoracic fluid content correlates strongly with fluid removal and weight loss during hemodialysis, offering a potential noninvasive monitoring tool.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support noninvasive fluid monitoring in hemodialysis; leaves open whether it improves outcomes.
Outpatient hemodialysis therapy (HD) can be associated with hemodynamic compromise. Bioreactance has recently been shown to provide accurate, noninvasive, continuous, measurements of cardiac output (CO) and thoracic impedance (Zo) from which thoracic fluid content (TFC) can be derived assuming TFC=1000/Zo. This study was designed to evaluate the changes in TFC in comparison with the traditional indices of fluid removal (FR) and to understand the trends in CO changes in HD patients. Minute-by-minute changes in TFC and CO were prospectively collected using the bioreactance system (NICOM) in HD patients of a single unit. Changes in body weight (DeltaW), hematocrit (DeltaHct), and amount of FR were also measured. Twenty-five patients (age 77 +/- 11 years) were included. The TFC decreased in all patients by an average of 5.4 +/- 7.9 kohm(-1), weight decreased by 1.48 +/- 0.98 kg, and FR averaged 2.07 +/- 1.93 L over a 3- to 4-hour HD session. There were good correlations between DeltaTFC and DeltaW (R=0.80, P<0.0001) and FR (R=0.85, P<0.0001). DeltaHct (4.13 +/- 3.42%) was poorly correlated with DeltaTFC (R=0.35, P=0.12) and FR (R=0.40, P=0.07). The regression line between FR and TFC yielded FR=1.0024-0.1985TFC; thus, a 1 kohm(-1) change of Zo correlates with an approximately 200 mL change in total body water. The change in CO (-0.52 +/- 0.49 L/min m(2)) during HD did not correlate with FR (R=0.15, P=NS). Changes in TFC represented the monitored variable most closely related to FR. CO remained fairly constant in this stable patient cohort. Further studies in high-risk patients are warranted to understand whether TFC and CO monitoring can improve HD session management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kossari et al. (2009) conducted an observational in Hemodialysis (n=25). Bioreactance monitoring (NICOM) vs. Traditional indices of fluid removal was evaluated on Correlation between changes in thoracic fluid content (TFC) and fluid removal (FR) (R=0.85, p=<0.0001). Changes in thoracic fluid content measured by bioreactance correlated strongly with fluid removal and weight change during hemodialysis.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: