Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional study reveals improved end-of-life care attitudes in undergraduate nursing students following curriculum training, highlighting gains in communication about death.
Aim To evaluate the preparedness of undergraduate nursing students for the provision of end-of-life care and to identify their self-perceived educational needs in this domain. Background The adequate preparation of nursing students for end-of-life care delivery remains a persistent challenge within undergraduate nursing curricula. A thorough understanding of students' educational needs in this domain constitutes a prerequisite for the development of effective didactic interventions. Design A cross-sectional study. Methods The study was conducted among 101 undergraduate nursing students, who were invited to complete a questionnaire comprising 9 items derived from the Polish adaptation of the FATCOD-B scale, alongside an author-developed 15-item instrument designed to assess educational needs pertaining to the care of dying patients. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and linear mixed-effects models. Results The mean total FATCOD-B-PL score (9-item version) increased from 32.1 ± 3.9 to 33.9 ± 4.2 points (p = 0.0002), reflecting a small-to-moderate improvement in attitudes toward the care of dying patients (dz ≈ 0.4). Item-level analysis identified statistically significant improvements across four domains, with the most pronounced gains observed in areas pertaining to communication about death and the dying process. In self-assessment, more than half of the participants (53.5%) rated their knowledge of end-of-life care as good or very good. Conclusions The findings indicate that palliative care education grounded in a structured curriculum and supplemented with simulation-based components may substantially contribute to the development of nursing students' attitudes toward end-of-life care, while concurrently highlighting domains of unmet educational need.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karasiewicz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: